Meaning of colon in group theory, if not subgroup index?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The colon notation in group theory, as seen in expressions like "(Z_5 X A_4):Z_2" and "(G_1 x G_2):G_3", signifies the semi-direct product rather than the index of a subgroup. This notation is utilized in the context of computational algebra systems, specifically GAP (Groups, Algorithms, Programming). The discussion clarifies that while the colon may suggest division, it is distinct from the traditional index notation G:H or quotient group G/H.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, particularly semi-direct products.
  • Familiarity with GAP (Groups, Algorithms, Programming) software.
  • Knowledge of isomorphism in algebraic structures.
  • Basic comprehension of subgroup notation and operations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of semi-direct products in group theory.
  • Explore the functionalities of GAP for computational group theory.
  • Study isomorphism and its implications in algebraic structures.
  • Investigate the differences between subgroup indices and quotient groups.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students of abstract algebra who are studying group theory and its computational applications, particularly those using GAP for group analysis.

AgentBased
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am reading a paper where the author uses colons in the description of groups. Example (not verbatim): "This subgroup is isomorphic to (Z_5 X A_4):Z_2". Several subgroups are described in the same way (as (G_1 x G_2):G_3) throughout the paper.

I have seen the colon in G:H to indicate the index of a subgroup H, in G, but that doesn't seem to make sense in this context. Does anyone know what this means?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps /, as in quotient group G/H? (they both suggest some sort of division)
 
Evidently, it turns out that it's semi-direct product. The notation comes from the computational algebra system GAP.
 

Thread 'Confusion about the Moyal-Weyl twist'

I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...
View full post »

Similar threads

Undergrad Differences between left vs right actions in some group theory questions
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
564
Undergrad Question about "A Group Epimorphism is Surjective"
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Groups of order 12 whose 3-Sylow subgroups are not normal.
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Finite Abelian Group: Showing Isomorphism & Subgroups of Order/Index p
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Can the commutator subgroup of a free group have infinite index?
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Prove Finite Simple Group has no Subgroup of Index 5
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Same symbol, different meanings? Subgroup index & field extension
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate Tensor symmetries and the symmetric groups
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Showing that a subgroup is subnormal in the original group G
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
What Defines a Normal Subgroup in Group Theory?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K