Undergrad Meaning of each member being a unit vector

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of unit vectors in the context of directional data and tensor products. Each observed directional data point, denoted as n(1), n(2), ..., n(N), is a unit vector, indicating a normalized direction in a multi-dimensional space. The average of these unit vectors is calculated using the tensor product, represented as ⟨ni1ni2...nin⟩, where N denotes the number of samples. The summation convention over tensor indices suggests that the indices represent the axes of the vectors, such as x, y, z in Cartesian coordinates, leading to the conclusion that the directional vectors from each sample are averaged together.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unit vectors in multi-dimensional space
  • Familiarity with tensor products and their applications
  • Knowledge of averaging techniques for vector data
  • Basic concepts of directional data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical properties of unit vectors in directional statistics
  • Explore the concept of fabric tensors and their applications in data analysis
  • Study the summation convention in tensor notation
  • Learn about the averaging of tensor products in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, mathematicians, and data analysts working with directional data, as well as students studying tensor analysis and its applications in various scientific fields.

AlekM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Meaning of each member being a unit vector, and how the products of each tensor can be averaged.
Summary: Meaning of each member being a unit vector, and how the products of each tensor can be averaged.

Hello!
I am struggling with understanding the meaning of "each member is a unit vector":
Let n(1), n(2), and n(N) be observed directional data, where each member is a unit vector. The most fundamental quantities are various averages of them. Since we are trying to seek tensor quantities to characterize the data distribution, we first consider the average of their tensor product, or the “moment”, and put
Ni1i2...in = ⟨ni1ni2...nin

I can see that N would represent the number of samples, and the pointy bracket represents an average:
Average of ith component of a = ⟨ai⟩ = (ai1+ai2+aiN)/N

However the notation of the averaged tensors in the text is ni2...nin, which leads me to wonder what i and n represent. It states that each member (of n?) is a unit vector, does that mean that each value of n is a normalized vector representing a direction? Or could a single value of n contain multiple vectors of directional data?

The paper later states that they adopt the summation convention over tensor indices, would this mean that something like i represents the axes that make up each vector (such as x,y,z in Cartesian) and 1 through n represents the axes that make up each vector? In that case it would seem that the directional vectors from each sample are averaged together. I'm not sure if I am on the right track or entirely incorrect.

Thanks in advance for any help,
Alek
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I read it as
AlekM said:
... does that mean that each value of n is a normalized vector representing a direction ...
We have ##N## observations and they span the phase space ##n^{(1)},\ldots,n^{(N)}##, i.e. each observed value ##n^{(i)}## is considered a basis vector of length ##1##. From there we can consider various other vectors in this space.

However, without context this is a bit of a guess.
 
  • Like
Likes AlekM
AlekM said:
The paper later states

Is the paper online? Can you give a link to it?
 
I just found that a page earlier direction is represented by unit vector n, so I think this is correct. However my next confusion is what nin represents.

As for the paper it is called "Distribution of Directional Data and Fabric Tensors," and I am referencing the beginning of page 2: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020722584900909
 
I can't read the paper since I'm not a member.

It surprised me how many articles are written about "fabric tensors". I hadn't heard of them before.

This thesis https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xm...2264/ShertzerR0811.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y defines them on page 58 of the PDF , page 38 of the document. Perhaps some forum member who is an expert in tensors can explain them.

FabricTensor1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes AlekM
Wow I'm not sure how I missed that source, it is incredibly useful. Thanks for sharing!

I didn't realize that link wasn't open to everyone, for anyone else reading this thread here is a mirror: http://einsteiniumstudios.com/fabric_tensors.pdf
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K