Meaning of totally antisymmetric tensor

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter homology
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A totally antisymmetric tensor, denoted as M^{\alpha\beta\gamma}, changes sign upon the exchange of any two indices, confirming the definition provided by Carroll in "Spacetime and Geometry." Conversely, a totally symmetric tensor does not exhibit any sign changes during index exchanges. The confusion arose from incorrectly assuming that the derivative of a tensor, specifically \partial_{\alpha}F_{\beta\gamma}, was totally symmetric, which led to errors in understanding its properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the concepts of symmetry and antisymmetry in tensors
  • Knowledge of the Levi-Civita symbol and its applications
  • Basic principles of differential geometry as discussed in Carroll's "Spacetime and Geometry"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol in detail
  • Learn about the implications of tensor symmetry in physical theories
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of differential forms and their relation to tensors
  • Review examples of antisymmetric and symmetric tensors in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics and physics, particularly those studying tensor calculus, differential geometry, and theoretical physics.

homology
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
Simple question I am confused on. If I have a tensor M^{\alpha\beta\gamma} that is totally antisymmetric in its indices then is it the case that M changes sign under the exchange of any two indices? And as a followup, a totally symmetric tensor has no sign changes on any pair exchange of indices?

Thanks,

Kevin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your definition of a tensor, and of a totally antisymmetric tensor (resp. totally symmetric tensor)?
 
Damn I think I figured out my problem. I was going off Carroll's definition/discussion of (anti-) symmetry (Spacetime and Geometry) which implies that an exchange of a pair of indices in a totally antisymmetric tensor yields a sign change. This is fine I realize now, what is not fine is the following.

I was looking at \partial_{\alpha}F_{\beta\gamma}. I know that \partial_{\[\alpha}F_{\beta\gamma\]}=0 and I then INCORRECTLY assumed that \partial_{\alpha}F_{\beta\gamma} was totally symmetric which was leading me into errors...argh...noob mistake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K