Measure the length of a material with Michelson interferometer

Click For Summary
To measure the length of a small piece of material using a Michelson interferometer, one approach involves placing the material behind the movable mirror and comparing light intensity at different positions. However, this method raises concerns about knowing the length beforehand and the ambiguity of measuring lengths due to wavelength limitations. Another suggestion is to insert the material into one of the light paths, but practical challenges arise in holding the material without obstructing the light. Interference patterns can provide valuable information if the index of refraction of the material is known, as changes in the pattern can indicate the material's properties. Overall, practical methods for holding the material and utilizing interference effectively remain key challenges in this measurement process.
HotMintea
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose you know the wavelength of light passing through a Michelson interferometer with high accuracy. Describe how you could use the interferometer to measure the length of a small piece of material.

2. The attempt at a solution

- Sandwich the piece of material behind the movable mirror, and compare the intensity(amplitude) of the light on the detector with the intensity when the mirror is at the initial position. But if I know how to sandwich it without compressing it, that means I already know the length of it. Even if possible, I think this won't tell whether the length is x or x+mλ/2 for integer m, so I must make the wavelength of the light longer than twice the length of the material. I read that the wavelength of far-infrared light can be about 1mm, so the material should be smaller than 0.5 mm.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#CIE_division_scheme) (Is there a type of light with longer wavelength than infrared?)

- Put the material in 1 of the 2 paths of light, and compare the light intensity on the detector with that when there is no material. But I realized I don't know any way of holding the material without restricting the path of light. Plus interference is irrelevant in this case.

Please correct my mistakes and provide some hints!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
HotMintea said:
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#CIE_division_scheme) (Is there a type of light with longer wavelength than infrared?)

Microwaves and radio waves are both EM radiation with much longer wavelengths, but they're not practical to work with using a conventional Michelson interferometer.

- Put the material in 1 of the 2 paths of light, and compare the light intensity on the detector with that when there is no material. But I realized I don't know any way of holding the material without restricting the path of light. Plus interference is irrelevant in this case.

Actually, interference isn't irrelevant. Assuming you know the material's index of refraction, how does the interference pattern change when you put the material in 1 path but not another? Remember that the pattern is initially circular, like this: http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/PHYS1241/links_light2/michelsn.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ideasrule said:
Microwaves and radio waves are both EM radiation with much longer wavelengths, but they're not practical to work with using a conventional Michelson interferometer.

Could you explain why microwaves and radio waves are not practical for a conventional Michelson interferometer? (Or could you perhaps provide some keywords, so that I can look them up?)

ideasrule said:
Actually, interference isn't irrelevant. Assuming you know the material's index of refraction, how does the interference pattern change when you put the material in 1 path but not another? Remember that the pattern is initially circular, like this: http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/PHYS1241/links_light2/michelsn.htm

Thanks for pointing it out. I was imagining light cannot pass through the material. Either way, my 2nd prospect doesn't seem to work unless there is a way to hold the piece of material without getting in the way of light.

Assuming both of my prospects don't work, I would like some hints at this point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K