Measure the length of a material with Michelson interferometer

AI Thread Summary
To measure the length of a small piece of material using a Michelson interferometer, one approach involves placing the material behind the movable mirror and comparing light intensity at different positions. However, this method raises concerns about knowing the length beforehand and the ambiguity of measuring lengths due to wavelength limitations. Another suggestion is to insert the material into one of the light paths, but practical challenges arise in holding the material without obstructing the light. Interference patterns can provide valuable information if the index of refraction of the material is known, as changes in the pattern can indicate the material's properties. Overall, practical methods for holding the material and utilizing interference effectively remain key challenges in this measurement process.
HotMintea
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose you know the wavelength of light passing through a Michelson interferometer with high accuracy. Describe how you could use the interferometer to measure the length of a small piece of material.

2. The attempt at a solution

- Sandwich the piece of material behind the movable mirror, and compare the intensity(amplitude) of the light on the detector with the intensity when the mirror is at the initial position. But if I know how to sandwich it without compressing it, that means I already know the length of it. Even if possible, I think this won't tell whether the length is x or x+mλ/2 for integer m, so I must make the wavelength of the light longer than twice the length of the material. I read that the wavelength of far-infrared light can be about 1mm, so the material should be smaller than 0.5 mm.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#CIE_division_scheme) (Is there a type of light with longer wavelength than infrared?)

- Put the material in 1 of the 2 paths of light, and compare the light intensity on the detector with that when there is no material. But I realized I don't know any way of holding the material without restricting the path of light. Plus interference is irrelevant in this case.

Please correct my mistakes and provide some hints!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
HotMintea said:
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#CIE_division_scheme) (Is there a type of light with longer wavelength than infrared?)

Microwaves and radio waves are both EM radiation with much longer wavelengths, but they're not practical to work with using a conventional Michelson interferometer.

- Put the material in 1 of the 2 paths of light, and compare the light intensity on the detector with that when there is no material. But I realized I don't know any way of holding the material without restricting the path of light. Plus interference is irrelevant in this case.

Actually, interference isn't irrelevant. Assuming you know the material's index of refraction, how does the interference pattern change when you put the material in 1 path but not another? Remember that the pattern is initially circular, like this: http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/PHYS1241/links_light2/michelsn.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ideasrule said:
Microwaves and radio waves are both EM radiation with much longer wavelengths, but they're not practical to work with using a conventional Michelson interferometer.

Could you explain why microwaves and radio waves are not practical for a conventional Michelson interferometer? (Or could you perhaps provide some keywords, so that I can look them up?)

ideasrule said:
Actually, interference isn't irrelevant. Assuming you know the material's index of refraction, how does the interference pattern change when you put the material in 1 path but not another? Remember that the pattern is initially circular, like this: http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/PHYS1241/links_light2/michelsn.htm

Thanks for pointing it out. I was imagining light cannot pass through the material. Either way, my 2nd prospect doesn't seem to work unless there is a way to hold the piece of material without getting in the way of light.

Assuming both of my prospects don't work, I would like some hints at this point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top