Measurement Errors in Kirchhoff's Voltage Law

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 6K views
Elliott Pryor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a lab, we explored Kirchhoff's Laws. I made a procedural mistake while measuring my voltage values across my different elements. I know that all of my calculated voltage sums are correct, so I was wondering what I might have done to have loops ACBA and CDBC have almost perfectly opposite voltage sums?
82882096.png

upload_2018-3-30_19-28-30.png


Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's Voltage Law: Around any closed loop the sum of the voltage changes is equal to zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea. Maybe I placed one probe at point B (the end of the circuit) and measured the voltage difference between each element and the end instead of across the element.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-3-30_19-25-11.png
    upload_2018-3-30_19-25-11.png
    9 KB · Views: 718
  • upload_2018-3-30_19-28-30.png
    upload_2018-3-30_19-28-30.png
    9 KB · Views: 2,436
  • 82882096.png
    82882096.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 2,199
Physics news on Phys.org
Elliott Pryor said:

Homework Statement


For a lab, we explored Kirchhoff's Laws. I made a procedural mistake while measuring my voltage values across my different elements. I know that all of my calculated voltage sums are correct, so I was wondering what I might have done to have loops ACBA and CDBC have almost perfectly opposite voltage sums?
View attachment 223092
View attachment 223091

Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's Voltage Law: Around any closed loop the sum of the voltage changes is equal to zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea. Maybe I placed one probe at point B (the end of the circuit) and measured the voltage difference between each element and the end instead of across the element.
Look for transcription errors in your recorded measurements (or you may have transcribed digits when you initially wrote down a measurement).
It may be significant that you have opposite errors of the same magnitude in two different loops. It suggests a common source for the error. What would be a common source of error for the two loops?
 
Last edited:
tnich said:
Look for transcription errors in your recorded measurements (or you may have transcribed digits when you initially wrote down a measurement).
It may be significant that you have opposite errors of the same magnitude in two different loops. It suggests a common source for the error. What would be a common source of error for the two loops?
Thank you! I never noticed!