Measurement OF a Beamsplitter - Destroys Quantum Interference?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of measuring the momentum of a beamsplitter in quantum interference experiments, particularly whether such measurements would destroy the interference pattern created by photons taking different paths. The scope includes theoretical considerations of quantum mechanics, entanglement, and the behavior of macroscopic objects in quantum systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether measuring the momentum of the beamsplitter would collapse the superposition of the photon states and destroy the interference pattern.
  • Another participant suggests that measuring the beamsplitter will not affect interference as long as it does not allow for the determination of the photon's path.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of measuring the beamsplitter's momentum without affecting the quantum state of the photons.
  • Some participants discuss the conservation of momentum in the interaction between the photon and the beamsplitter, noting that the total momentum must remain constant.
  • There is a suggestion that the beamsplitter's role in measuring polarization may complicate the interaction dynamics.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the possibility of achieving the type of measurement proposed, stating that photons do not interact with the beamsplitter in a classical manner.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether measuring the beamsplitter's momentum would collapse the superposition of photon states and affect the interference pattern. There is no consensus on the implications of such measurements, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants assume that the beamsplitter is macroscopic and consider the implications of its measurement on quantum interference. There are unresolved questions regarding the precise conditions under which measurements would affect the quantum states involved.

  • #61
PeroK said:
Wouldn't you also need to know the initial momentum of the photon? Measuring the recoil on the disc would give you (at best) the change in momentum of the photon.

In any case, I found this paper (which looks quite interesting) and has a discussion of this with reference to the Bohr-Einstein debates.

http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/701/1/012007/pdf

That paper looks amazing! Thank you very much!

I mean bouncing electrons off of tiny things like nanofabricated double slits and oil droplets etc... that's just the sandbox I'm interested in.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
PeterDonis said:
This is all speculative and has no prospect of being tested experimentally any time soon.

That's too bad. This "measurement collapse" issue and quantum gravity are two things that need to be to solved.Thanks Peter for your insights, you've helped resolve much of the confusion here,
hopefully nothing is left unresolved on this thread which could potentially mislead any unwary bystander.

Cheers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
685
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K