Measuring advancing contact angle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on measuring the advancing contact angle of molten thermoplastics on carbon fibers, highlighting the distinction between dynamic contact angles and static contact angles. Two primary methods for measuring dynamic contact angles are identified: the dynamic sessile drop method and the modified dynamic Wilhelmy method. The participants debate whether the advancing contact angle is consistent across these methods, considering that the sessile drop method involves the liquid moving over the solid, while the Wilhelmy method involves the solid moving into the liquid. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these differences in the context of low capillary numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dynamic contact angles and static contact angles
  • Familiarity with the dynamic sessile drop method
  • Knowledge of the modified dynamic Wilhelmy method
  • Basic principles of capillarity and fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between dynamic and static contact angles
  • Explore the principles behind the dynamic sessile drop method
  • Investigate the modified dynamic Wilhelmy method in detail
  • Study the effects of capillary numbers on contact angle measurements
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers in materials science, particularly those focused on polymer interactions with surfaces, as well as anyone involved in the measurement of contact angles in fluid dynamics.

Experience111
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone !

I'm currently working on a project for which I need to measure the advancing contact angle of a liquid on a solid, specifically the advancing contact angle of a molten thermoplastic on carbon fibers.

My understanding is that there is a difference between dynamic contact angles and contact angles at rest. I know of two methods to measure the dynamic contact angles : the dynamic sessile drop method and the modified dynamic Wilhelmy method.

However, these two methods look like they measure something different to me : in the sessile drop method the liquid is advancing (or receding) on the solid, and in the Wilhelmy method, the solid (fiber in my case) is advancing or receding into the liquid.

So my question to you is : is what we call the advancing contact angle measured using these two methods the same ? Or is the advancing contact angle different depending on if the solid is moving into the liquid or the liquid on the solid ?

Thanks for your answers ! :smile:

NB : Not sure if I should have posted this in Classical Physics instead of General Physics, let me know if I did something wrong !
 
Experience111 said:
However, these two methods look like they measure something different to me : in the sessile drop method the liquid is advancing (or receding) on the solid, and in the Wilhelmy method, the solid (fiber in my case) is advancing or receding into the liquid.

Given that the capillary number for these measurements is very low, why do you think it matters?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
52K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
936
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K