Experiment to measure EM waves

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of an experiment to measure electromagnetic (EM) waves and the underlying principles of wave generation and measurement. Participants explore concepts related to classical electromagnetism, the generation of waves from charges, and the potential for using different types of charges in experiments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the speed of propagation of EM waves can change depending on the refractive index, contrary to the original assertion that it remains constant.
  • One participant mentions the concept of Pair Production, where high-energy EM waves can produce electron-positron pairs, but emphasizes that a single electron cannot be created from EM waves alone due to conservation of charge.
  • Another participant suggests that the original poster might be interested in experimenting with radio technology, indicating that building a radio could be a feasible project.
  • There are claims that the generation of EM waves from moving charges and the reverse process are fundamental to radio theory, highlighting the relationship between waves and particles.
  • Concerns are raised about misunderstandings regarding particles, waves, and electromagnetism, with a participant noting the complexity of interactions in other fundamental forces compared to electromagnetism.
  • Suggestions are made regarding the use of RF transmitters and receivers for studying EM waves, while also noting the challenges of investigating other types of waves, such as gravitational waves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of wave propagation and the possibility of reversing EM waves into particles. There is no consensus on the feasibility of the proposed experiment, and multiple competing views remain regarding the principles of electromagnetism and wave generation.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings about the fundamental principles of electromagnetism, the complexity of interactions in other forces, and the practical challenges of conducting experiments involving high-energy EM waves or other fundamental forces.

victum_astrum
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Okay, let me prelude this by saying I only have an -EXTREMELY- limited understanding of classical physics, and zero knowledge of quantum mechanics. This is really just my asking a few questions in regards to an idea I had for an experiment, and what would be a good and accurate way to scientifically measure it. If this is something that requires an advanced degree in QFT, please feel free to ignore this post/move it to the trash bin.

[PREMISE]
So according to Maxwell, an oscillating electric charge set at a specific frequency generates EM/light waves. The strength of the induced field is proportional to the rate of change of the inducing field.

Now the electric & magnetic fields 'regenerate' each other at a constant speed - the speed of light - so energy conservation is maintained. The frequency can change, but the speed of propagation never changes.

[QUESTIONS] - 1 and 2 are not related to the experiment.
1: Can this process be reversed? Could you somehow translate an EM wave back into an electron, or is this some string theory level crap?

2: Can other wave types such as gravity or sound also be reversed into a corresponding particle?

[ACTUAL EXPERIMENT QUESTION]
3: Can different charges besides the electric charge be used to generate any kind of field (positive/neutral), and if so what would that fields properties be?

[OBJECTIVE]
My objective is doing a simple little experiment in seeing what other methods exist in creating waves and measuring them. The problem lies in the fact that I'm unsure what kind of apparatus you would need to measure and set wave frequency, charge, etc... I also had a neat little idea wherein instead of somehow magically charging an object with electrons or protons I could just use cations and anions in some kind of liquid held in a test tube or something, to see if I could create a similar process, making this kind of a chemistry/physics combo. Maybe I'd use the negatively charged tube as my control group or something.

So I'd appreciate any responses or input to my ideas here.. are they complete garbage, not doable in a home lab setting, or is my thinking way off? Basically the tl;dr is I'd like to know what (if any) devices I'd need to set this up. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
victum_astrum said:
The frequency can change, but the speed of propagation never changes.
It's the other way around, the frequency never change (at least up to linear interaction in the matter) but the speed of propagation changes depending on the refractive index.
victum_astrum said:
Can this process be reversed? Could you somehow translate an EM wave back into an electron, or is this some string theory level crap?
Search for the so-called Pair Production. This process needs EM wave with photon energy at least 1.02 MeV (i.e. gamma ray) to produce electron and positron pair.
 
It sounds to me like you are looking to experiment with radio. You certainly can build one yourself.
 
Unfortunately, you seem to have quite a few misunderstandings about particles, waves, and electromagnetism in general. I will point out however, that creating EM waves from moving charges and the converse, moving charges using EM waves, is the basic premise of radio. Antenna theory would go into great detail on this matter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
victum_astrum said:
[QUESTIONS] - 1 and 2 are not related to the experiment.
1: Can this process be reversed? Could you somehow translate an EM wave back into an electron, or is this some string theory level crap?

No, not really. You cannot create a single electron from EM waves. That would be a violation of conservation of charge. Note that you aren't turning an electron into an EM wave. You are using energy to accelerate the electron and it is this energy that is being transformed into the EM wave, not the electron. You can certainly reverse this process and turn the EM wave back into another form of energy. That's what antennas and radio receivers do.

victum_astrum said:
[ACTUAL EXPERIMENT QUESTION]
3: Can different charges besides the electric charge be used to generate any kind of field (positive/neutral), and if so what would that fields properties be?

The electromagnetic interaction (or EM force) is the only one that contains two charges with relatively simple rules for its interactions. Newtonian gravitation has a single "charge" (everything attracts) and in GR it isn't even a force. The strong and weak forces have some very complicated interactions that aren't entirely understood and aren't always analogous to electromagnetism. You can find plenty of details on these interactions on wikipedia and plenty of other places on the web.

victum_astrum said:
[OBJECTIVE]
My objective is doing a simple little experiment in seeing what other methods exist in creating waves and measuring them. The problem lies in the fact that I'm unsure what kind of apparatus you would need to measure and set wave frequency, charge, etc... I also had a neat little idea wherein instead of somehow magically charging an object with electrons or protons I could just use cations and anions in some kind of liquid held in a test tube or something, to see if I could create a similar process, making this kind of a chemistry/physics combo. Maybe I'd use the negatively charged tube as my control group or something.

So I'd appreciate any responses or input to my ideas here.. are they complete garbage, not doable in a home lab setting, or is my thinking way off? Basically the tl;dr is I'd like to know what (if any) devices I'd need to set this up. Thanks in advance!

There are plenty of suitable RF transmitters and receivers that would work fine if you want to study EM waves. As for other waves, unless they're the waves in your bathtub or home pool, you're probably out of luck. It took billions of dollars to detect the first gravitational waves, so that's kind of out of the question, as is any investigation into the other fundamental forces.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K