Measuring entangled state of degenerate eigenstates

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of an entangled state involving degenerate eigenstates in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the implications of measuring the energy of one subsystem on the overall state of the entangled system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an entangled state of two systems and questions the resulting state after measuring the energy of one subsystem, suggesting a specific form for the post-measurement state.
  • Another participant questions whether the measurement provides new information about the state, implying that the outcome may not change the state significantly.
  • A different viewpoint argues that measuring the energy of subsystem B does not alter the state of the overall system AB, as the measurement does not distinguish between the degenerate states.
  • One participant counters that measuring energy and applying the Hamiltonian operator are fundamentally different processes, asserting that measurement collapses the state to one of the eigenstates, while the Hamiltonian does not change the state of an eigenstate.
  • A later reply indicates a change in perspective, suggesting agreement with another participant's viewpoint but expresses regret over the inability to retract a previous statement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of measuring energy on the state of the system. There is no consensus on whether the measurement alters the state or retains it in a superposition due to the degeneracy of the eigenstates.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of degenerate eigenstates and the nature of measurement in quantum mechanics, highlighting the complexity of the situation without resolving the underlying assumptions or mathematical details.

maxverywell
Messages
197
Reaction score
2
Let's suppose that we have an entangled state of two systems ##A## and ##B##:
$$
\frac{1}{2}\left(|\psi_1 \phi_1\rangle+|\psi_2 \phi_2\rangle \right)
$$
where ##|\psi \rangle## and ##|\phi \rangle## are energy eigenstates of ##A## and ##B## respectively. However the eigenstates##|\phi_1\rangle## and ##|\phi_2\rangle## are degenerate:
$$
\hat{H}_B|\phi_1\rangle=E|\phi_1\rangle
$$
$$
\hat{H}_B|\phi_2\rangle=E|\phi_2\rangle
$$
What will be the state of the system ##AB## after measuring the energy of ##B## and finding the value ##E##?
My guess is:
$$
\frac{\left(|\psi_1\rangle+|\psi_2 \rangle \right)}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{\left(|\phi_1\rangle+\phi_2\rangle \right)}{\sqrt{2}}
$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Has the measurement revealed anything about the state that you didn't already know?
 
If the state is
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big(|\psi_{1}\rangle|\phi_{1}\rangle +|\psi_{2}\rangle|\phi_{2}\rangle\Big)
And
\hat{H}_{B}|\phi_{1}\rangle= E|\phi_{1}\rangle and \hat{H}_{B}|\phi_{2}\rangle =E|\phi_{2}\rangle
then measuring the energy of B without touching A has the effect of applying the operator \big(I\otimes\hat{H}_{B}\big) onto the state, giving us
\big(I\otimes\hat{H}_{B}\big)\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big(|\psi_{1}\rangle|\phi_{1}\rangle +|\psi_{2}\rangle|\phi_{2}\rangle\Big).
As a result, the state us unaltered, up to a constant factor:
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big(\big(I\otimes\hat{H}_{B}\big)|\psi_{1}\rangle|\phi_{1}\rangle +\big(I\otimes\hat{H}_{B}\big)|\psi_{2}\rangle|\phi_{2}\rangle\Big)
=E\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big(|\psi_{1}\rangle|\phi_{1}\rangle +|\psi_{2}\rangle|\phi_{2}\rangle\Big).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mentz114
I think that measuring energy and acting on the state with the Hamiltonian operator is not the same thing. For example, if the state is a superposition of energy eigenstates, then this state is also an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, and acting with the Hamiltonian operator on this state doesn't change it. However, measuring the energy will change the state ("collapse it") to one of the eigenstates that compose the initial superposition state.

In my example It seems wrong that measuring the energy of the system B won't have any effect on its state or the state of the whole system AB. Think that if the states ##\phi_1## and ##\phi_2## weren't degenerate (i.e. ##E_1 \neq E_2##), then after the measurement the state of the system B would be ##\phi_1## or ##\phi_2##, therefore the state of the AB becomes ##\psi_1 \phi_1## or ##\psi_2\phi_2##, depending on the outcome of the measurement (##E_1## or ##E_2##). In the degenerate case, the measurement of the energy cannot distinguish this two states in principle, thus creating a superposition of them.
 
Now that I have rethought it, I think that https://www.physicsforums.com/members/jfizzix.190322/ is right, but cannot delete my last post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jilang

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K