Measuring impact force on rubber spacers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on measuring the impact force absorbed by silicon rubber spacers used in conjunction with a polycarbonate shell. The user is attempting to derive an approximate value for the impact load and stress distribution, as the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) model is not yielding results. Key considerations include the tension, compression, and shear forces acting on the spacers during impact, as well as the complexity of the overall impact profile. The conversation suggests setting up a test rig to empirically measure the impact force, as theoretical calculations may not accurately predict the behavior of the spacers under real-world conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of impact force measurement techniques
  • Familiarity with Finite Element Analysis (FEA) modeling
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically polycarbonate and silicon rubber
  • Basic principles of mechanics, including tension, compression, and shear forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for setting up an impact testing rig
  • Learn about the mechanics of damped spring systems for modeling impacts
  • Explore advanced FEA techniques for complex load distributions
  • Investigate empirical methods for measuring stress distribution in materials
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, product designers, and researchers involved in impact testing and material performance analysis, particularly those working with elastomeric materials and structural components.

Hank P
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need to find the impact force that can be absorbed by these spacers as shown in the image. The spacers are radially distributed over the shell, and they are supposed to dampen any external impact loads to reduce the effective stress inside the inner shell. Since the FEA model is not showing results, I thought of attempting it by hand to get an approximate value. A curve relating the impact load and stress at the inner shell would be enough.

However, I cannot figure out how to account for the distribution of these spacers, since depending on the load some of these will be in tension, compression and/or shear. The shell is polycarbonate and the spacers are silicon rubber.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    74.1 KB · Views: 554
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you need to know the impact force that can be absorbed?
Surely you just need to know that the spacers can take a prescribed maximum impact?
In which case you need only measure for impact with only one.

Note: it is not the sort of thing you calculate: drop it on something hard (or drop something hard on it) with an accelerometer inside.
That sounds drastic I know - to et an idea of what to expect, you set up a test rig to work out how each spacer behaves.

The overall impact profile will be very complicated - the thingy may initially strike 1, or 2, or 3 at once - probably just one at a glancing blow - then would bounce and roll, maybe also deforming, to bring other spacers in contact. There is no what to predict the exact results.

You could model specific impact profiles by treating the device as two spheres separated by damped springs.
 
This doesn't help with the question, but I'm curious: How does it work with the 2 intermediate shells? Do the spacers just go through holes in them, or are they also attached?
 
Thanks Simon. I guess I'll keep trying and see if the simulation works. Can't set up an experiment where I work. I could just do this with a single spacer, but a spherical surface helps distribute the forces all over, so my calculation would just be an approximation for a flat surface.

Danger, The spacers have cones with flats on both ends, which mate with flats on the shells.
 
Hank P said:
anger, The spacers have cones with flats on both ends, which mate with flats on the shells.
Okay, I think that I can sort of see that now. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K