Measuring mass without a balance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around designing a method to measure the mass of an object without using direct weighing techniques like balances. A proposed method involves using water displacement to measure the mass by calculating the overflow when the object is submerged. Participants express uncertainty about the validity of this approach and discuss the relevance of specific gravity in determining mass. Concerns are raised about the potential connection to the International Physics Olympiad, with a suggestion that it might constitute cheating. Ultimately, the thread was closed due to these concerns.
warwick$$
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are to design, build and test a method to accurately measure the mass of an object. You cannot directly weigh the object but must use experimental data to determine your result. You cannot build any type of spring balance or beam balance. You are to determine your method of gathering information and how to analyse data to determine the mass.

The object will be a premeasured amount of sand in a specimen jar. The mass force of both the object and its container will be considered the force that you are to determine. The mass of the object will be between 50g and 200g. You will be provided with 4 x 50g masses and a 50g mass carrier to calibrate your device on the day

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought the easiest way to find the mass would be to fill a beaker to the top, put the object in, and measure the water that overflowed. The last sentence in the question made me think twice about that method. I am on the right track or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about this:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/SLAMMD.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
that helps, but i am unsure to how i could use that in relation to my experiment. i know F=ma, but how could i find the acceleration?
 
Is this a question from the current International Physics Olympiad? If so, I would consider it cheating and request this thread be closed.
 
yes , your are doing correct ,
the mass of an object can be measured through the specific gravity experiment .
 
Dickfore said:
Is this a question from the current International Physics Olympiad? If so, I would consider it cheating and request this thread be closed.

Thread closed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top