Measuring mass without a balance

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around designing a method to measure the mass of an object without using direct weighing techniques like balances. A proposed method involves using water displacement to measure the mass by calculating the overflow when the object is submerged. Participants express uncertainty about the validity of this approach and discuss the relevance of specific gravity in determining mass. Concerns are raised about the potential connection to the International Physics Olympiad, with a suggestion that it might constitute cheating. Ultimately, the thread was closed due to these concerns.
warwick$$
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are to design, build and test a method to accurately measure the mass of an object. You cannot directly weigh the object but must use experimental data to determine your result. You cannot build any type of spring balance or beam balance. You are to determine your method of gathering information and how to analyse data to determine the mass.

The object will be a premeasured amount of sand in a specimen jar. The mass force of both the object and its container will be considered the force that you are to determine. The mass of the object will be between 50g and 200g. You will be provided with 4 x 50g masses and a 50g mass carrier to calibrate your device on the day

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought the easiest way to find the mass would be to fill a beaker to the top, put the object in, and measure the water that overflowed. The last sentence in the question made me think twice about that method. I am on the right track or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about this:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/SLAMMD.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
that helps, but i am unsure to how i could use that in relation to my experiment. i know F=ma, but how could i find the acceleration?
 
Is this a question from the current International Physics Olympiad? If so, I would consider it cheating and request this thread be closed.
 
yes , your are doing correct ,
the mass of an object can be measured through the specific gravity experiment .
 
Dickfore said:
Is this a question from the current International Physics Olympiad? If so, I would consider it cheating and request this thread be closed.

Thread closed.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K