Measuring the entropy of the universe?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of measuring the entropy of the universe, particularly in relation to the number of observable photons, as mentioned in a lecture by Leonard Susskind. Participants explore the connection between photon number and total entropy, considering both theoretical implications and practical challenges in measurement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references Susskind's claim that the entropy of the universe may be linked to the number of observable photons.
  • Another participant suggests that photons are a byproduct of energetic processes that contribute to entropy increase within systems.
  • A different viewpoint posits that the cosmic microwave background (CMB) contains a vast number of photons, which may serve as a key indicator for tracking entropy, though this approach has limitations due to the thermalized nature of the CMB.
  • It is noted that the entropy per photon in a thermalized radiation field is constant, implying that knowing the photon number alone does not provide insight into changes in entropy over time.
  • One participant argues that since the photon number in the CMB is stable, the overall entropy of the universe is largely unchanging, with minor contributions from other processes like starlight and supernovae.
  • There is speculation about the relevance of entropy in a multiverse context, where comparisons of different universes' entropies might be considered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of photon number in measuring entropy, with some suggesting it is a stable indicator while others question its relevance due to the unchanging nature of the CMB's photon count. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these viewpoints.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption that the CMB's photon number is constant and the implications of thermalization on entropy measurement. The discussion does not resolve how these factors affect the overall understanding of entropy in the universe.

noahcharris
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I was recently watching one of Susskind's 'Theoretical Minimum' lectures in which he says that the entropy of the universe may be measured via the number of observable photons, and that somehow these quantities (photon number and total entropy) are somehow linked. Could anybody with knowledge in the area elucidate this connection? Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A link is helpful when asking for feedback on specific material.
 
Photons are a waste product of energetic processes. All such processes increase the entropy of the system within which they occur.
 
Last edited:
I suspect the issue is that the vast number of particles in the universe, by perhaps a factor of a billion, are photons in the CMB. So if you want to track where the entropy is, look there. However, this is not a very good way to look at changes in entropy in the universe, because the CMB is a thermalized radiation field, and the entropy per photon in any thermalized radiation field is the same (it's an order unity constant times the Boltzmann factor). Thus, if you know the photon number, you know the entropy, independent of temperature. Since the photon number in the CMB is not changing, the entropy of the universe as a whole is largely not changing. Where the small changes are coming from on top of that has to do with heat transport, like starlight and supernovae, but it must be a small fraction of the total. So the entropy in the CMB is both the dominant entropy in the universe, and is unchanging with time, so it doesn't sound like it is very important. Maybe it comes up in a multiverse kind of setting, where you could imagine comparing the entropies of different universes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: noahcharris

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K