Measuring the size of the observable universe

Click For Summary
The observable universe is commonly estimated at 93 trillion light years, but some argue it could be infinite. The belief in a finite universe often stems from assumptions about its size at the first Planck time and the application of Hubble's constant. Some physicists suggest the universe was just a centimeter across after inflation, supporting the finite model. However, current experiments and models cannot definitively distinguish between a very large finite universe and an infinite one. The discussion highlights the complexities in measuring the universe's size and the ongoing debate among scientists.
g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
The size of the observable universe usually gets put at 93 trillion light years, though some people believe it is infinite, though I'm not sure which camp is in the majority. Those who believe it is 93 trillion light years across are they just assuming that the size of the universe at the first Planck time was finite, I'm guessing 10^-35 m? And they are just using Hubble's constant, along the evidence of the extent to which Hubble's constant has sped up and slowed down over time, to calculate the size of the universe? I've read quite a few times that some physicists believe the universe was a centimeter across after inflation, hence finite. Again, let me state my question more succinctly, is the idea that the universe is finite just an assumption or is there some equation which requires it?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The size of the observable universe usually gets put at 93 trillion light years, though some people believe it is infinite
I would expect this "infinite" refers to the total universe, not just the observable part. Otherwise, can you provide a source for this claim?
The same is true for the size of the observable universe (which is not the size of the total universe) after inflation.

The universe can be finite or infinite - if it is small enough, it can be possible to measure its size, but we cannot distinguish between "really large" and "infinite" with current experiments and models.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
10K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K