MECalculating E°cell for IO3-(aq) + Fe2+(aq) --> Fe3+(aq) + I2(s)

  • Thread starter Thread starter salman213
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the standard cell potential, E°cell, for the reaction IO3-(aq) + Fe2+(aq) --> Fe3+(aq) + I2(s). The half-reaction for Fe3+ to Fe2+ has a standard reduction potential of +0.77 V. The second half-reaction, IO3-(aq) to I2(s), was balanced to 12 H + 2IO3 + 5e- --> I2 + 6H2O, with a standard reduction potential found to be +1.19 V from an external source. Participants seek clarification on how this E° value was determined, as it is not present in standard textbooks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of standard reduction potentials
  • Knowledge of balancing redox reactions
  • Familiarity with galvanic cells
  • Access to standard electrode potential tables
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to balance redox reactions using half-reactions
  • Learn about standard electrode potentials and their applications
  • Explore online resources for standard reduction potentials
  • Study the Nernst equation for calculating cell potentials under non-standard conditions
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals involved in electrochemistry, particularly those focused on redox reactions and galvanic cell calculations.

salman213
Messages
301
Reaction score
1
1. Using tabulated standard reduction potentials from your text, calculate the standard cell potential, E°cell (always positive for a galvanic cell), based on the following (unbalanced) reaction:

IO3-(aq) + Fe2+(aq) --> Fe3+(aq) + I2(s)


3.

well you see i made the half reactions

Fe3+ (aq) ---> Fe2+(aq) EØ was easily found +0.77 V

IO3-(aq) ---> I2(s)


balanced the 2nd one to

12 H + 2IO3 + 5e- ---> I2 + 6H2O
E CELL = ??

I CANT FIND THIS REACTION'S ECELL IN MY TEXT BOOK BUT SOMEHOW I FOUND IT ON THIS WEBSITE TO BE EØ = +1.19V, HOW DID THEY GET THIS VALUE! PLEASE HELP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any idea anyone??
 
ok, first let's clear up any confusion

is it ...

IO_{3}^{-}(aq)\rightarrow I_{2}(s)
 
all they simply did was, balance out the equation with (first) H2O on the product side, then H+ on the reactant side

i do not have my Chemistry book with me atm, so i cannot give you an in-depth explanation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
46K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
23K