MECH 360 - Question about strain energy problem with beams

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the total strain energy in a beam subjected to an applied moment. Participants are exploring the implications of bending moment diagrams and the correct setup for integrals in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to split the integral based on the moment's variation across the beam. They express uncertainty about their algebraic manipulation and seek validation of their method. Other participants suggest drawing bending moment diagrams to identify potential mistakes and question the accuracy of the original poster's moment balance equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's approach. Some guidance has been offered regarding the bending moment diagram and the definition of the moment function, but there is no clear consensus on the correctness of the original poster's method.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is an acknowledgment of potential fatigue affecting the original poster's calculations.

theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to find the total strain energy in the beam with a moment applied:

rCICdQ0.png


The Attempt at a Solution


For my attempt I decided to split the integral into two parts since the moment is different depending on whether or not you are on the left side of the moment or on the right side.

I know there is an easier method; that the loading has a kind of skew-symmetry, so you might be able to take a short cut by evaluating the left side integral with a coordinate system x starting from A and going to the right, and the right side integral with a coordinate system X starting from B and going to the left.

BamS31S.png


However, for my attempt I decided to do the integral I circled with red below. When I run through the algebra I do not get the correct answer which is:

fbHCyIe.png


So I would like to know... Is my method correct or did I just do my algebra wrong. I feel like what I did should work... I spent a few hours on this and kept getting the wrong answer (might be just because I was tired and slept very little :zzz:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe if you drew a bending moment diagram you would see your mistake.
 
paisiello2 said:
Maybe if you drew a bending moment diagram you would see your mistake.

Hmmm, so I drew it out and I get this:
WC6AnVV.jpg


I guess it makes sense since there is a moment in the beam so we should expect a discontinuity so I am not sure where my mistake is still :(.
 
Are you sure you have the correct BM diagram?
 
SteamKing said:
Are you sure you have the correct BM diagram?

Hmmm, I went over my moment balance equation several times and got the same equations, then I plugged in x = a and got the values... I feel like I am doing something really dumb and I can't seem to figure out what.
 
So I did it with Macaulay Equations and got the same answer:
P5KEAJb.jpg
 
Well, it looks like to me that either your BMD is wrong or you are misreading it because the formula you are entering appears wrong.
 
theBEAST said:
Hmmm, I went over my moment balance equation several times and got the same equations, then I plugged in x = a and got the values... I feel like I am doing something really dumb and I can't seem to figure out what.

You expression for M(x) for a <= x < L is suspect. When x = a, M(a) = Mo * (b/L),
and when x = L, M(L) = 0. You should check your definition of M(x) and see if it
returns these values for M(a) and M(L).
 
paisiello2 said:
Well, it looks like to me that either your BMD is wrong or you are misreading it because the formula you are entering appears wrong.

But is the integral I circled in red correct, is my method correct?
 
  • #10
Yes, the integral and your approach look right. Just the execution is off.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
736
Replies
5
Views
7K