Mechanics: energy and momentum Q

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the ratio of kinetic energy to potential energy for an object moving from a height of 10m at point A to a height of 4m at point B, assuming a frictionless slope. The object starts from rest at point A.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential energy at different heights and the kinetic energy at various points during the object's motion. There is uncertainty regarding the equations to use and the necessity of mass in calculations. Some participants suggest that mass will cancel out in the ratio.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of potential and kinetic energy, questioning the reference level for potential energy, and discussing the implications of the energy conservation principle. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations, but no consensus has been reached on the exact approach.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of explicit information regarding initial and final velocities, and the problem does not provide a distance between points A and B. The discussion also notes that the question may not relate to momentum despite its inclusion in the homework context.

NOP90
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Point [A] is 10m above ground and slopes down to the ground and then back up to point which is 4m above ground. Assuming that the object starts from rest at point [A] and that the slope is frictionless, calculate the ratio of the kinetic energy to the potential energy when the body reaches point

Homework Equations


I am not sure. That is the problem, I don't know what equation to use. It may one of the equations of motion. Also could be kei + pei = kef + pef or mvi^2/2 + mgyi = mvf^2/2 + mgyf (note that the i's and f' represent initial and final)


The Attempt at a Solution


it's the 3rd question of 8 and they seem to get more challenging as you continue so this should not be to hard after I find out which equation. I've just messed around with the heights and the Earth's gravitational pull 9.8m/s^2. It doesn't give an initial or final velocity or a mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the ground as your reference level for 0 potential energy.
1)Compute the Potential energy at A.
2)Find out its kinetic energy at the lowest point (on the ground).
3)This kinetic energy gets converted as the potential energy + kinetic energy at point B (some K.E. will also be there as the point B is lower than A). Find them

Now find the ratio.

EDIT:This question is no way related to momentum.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi NOP90! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
NOP90 said:
Point [A] is 10m above ground and slopes down to the ground and then back up to point which is 4m above ground. Assuming that the object starts from rest at point [A] and that the slope is frictionless, calculate the ratio of the kinetic energy to the potential energy when the body reaches point


You don't need to know m, it'll cancel.

Where is the PE is measured from? :confused:

If it's measured from A, you don't even need to know the heights. :wink:
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
Take the ground as your reference level for 0 potential energy.
1)Compute the Potential energy at A.
2)Find out its kinetic energy at the lowest point (on the ground).
3)This kinetic energy gets converted as the potential energy + kinetic energy at point B (some K.E. will also be there as the point B is lower than A). Find them

Now find the ratio.

EDIT:This question is no way related to momentum.

Don't I need a mass to work out PE (PE=mgh)? Also, it's the equations that I am having trouble with, so when you say find them (how??). The booklet covers questions from energy and momentum. So I guess it's just energy, sorry.

tiny-tim said:
Hi NOP90! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)


You don't need to know m, it'll cancel.

Where is the PE is measured from? :confused:

If it's measured from A, you don't even need to know the heights. :wink:


Thank you for your welcoming :smile: the object slides from point [A] down the slope and then up another slope to point . There is a diagram in the book so I've tried to describe it for you in all its glory. I re-read my post and saw that I didn't mention it slides. The answer is 1.5 but it's the working I am interested in. I still don't know what equations to use :frown: You say m will cancel but I also don't know velocity intial or final. It doesn't give the distance between points [A] and just there heights.
 
Hi NOP90! :smile:
NOP90 said:
… The answer is 1.5 …

ah, in that case, clearly the PE is being measured from the ground level.

ok, if PE at 0 m is 0, then what is the PE at 10 m and at 4 m?

(call the mass "m" and gravity "g")

and (since we know the KE at 10 m is zero) so what is the KE at 4 m ? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi NOP90! :smile:


ah, in that case, clearly the PE is being measured from the ground level.

ok, if PE at 0 m is 0, then what is the PE at 10 m and at 4 m?

(call the mass "m" and gravity "g")

and (since we know the KE at 10 m is zero) so what is the KE at 4 m ? :wink:


hmm so 6/4 gives 1.5 but still not sure how this came about. Is it that kinetic energy is 0 at 10m and then when it reaches the ground it's kinetic energy is 10, it doesn't stop here however and continues sliding upwards of 4m. 10 - 4 then gives the kinetic energy at point B (6) seeming an upwards slope causes that body to lose kinetic energy. The potential energy corresponds to the height so at point B it's 4m high so its PE is 4? Ratio then becomes 6/4.
 
NOP90 said:
Don't I need a mass to work out PE (PE=mgh)? Also, it's the equations that I am having trouble with, so when you say find them (how??). The booklet covers questions from energy and momentum. So I guess it's just energy, sorry.

No you don't need to.
You have to find the ratio between K.E. and P.E. and in such problems there is no need of knowing mass, it gets cancelled.
Just keep the expressions in terms of 'm' and proceed.
 
Hi NOP90! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
NOP90 said:
hmm so 6/4 gives 1.5 but still not sure how this came about. Is it that kinetic energy is 0 at 10m and then when it reaches the ground it's kinetic energy is 10, it doesn't stop here however and continues sliding upwards of 4m. 10 - 4 then gives the kinetic energy at point B (6) seeming an upwards slope causes that body to lose kinetic energy. The potential energy corresponds to the height so at point B it's 4m high so its PE is 4? Ratio then becomes 6/4.

That's exactly right. :smile:

Though you didn't need to find the KE at the ground

you could just have said that the PE at A is 10mg, the PE at B is 6mg, the KE at A is 0, and since KE + PE = constant, that means the KE at B is 4mg. :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K