Men Cleverer than Women, Say Scientists

  • Thread starter Thread starter Friendly Immigrant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Women
Click For Summary
A controversial study published in the British Journal of Psychology claims that men have larger brains and higher IQs than women, suggesting this contributes to their greater likelihood of winning Nobel prizes and achieving academic distinction. This assertion has sparked debate, particularly as it contradicts the trend of women outperforming men in educational settings. Critics argue that the study overlooks social factors that hinder women's recognition in academia and that IQ tests may not accurately measure intelligence, as they can be biased towards male-dominated interests. Discussions also highlight the importance of considering different types of intelligence, such as creativity and practical skills, which may not be reflected in traditional IQ assessments. The conversation touches on the historical underrepresentation of women in fields like mathematics and the potential influence of societal expectations on performance and recognition. Overall, the debate emphasizes the complexity of measuring intelligence and the need to account for various cognitive abilities and social dynamics.
  • #31
arildno said:
Psychologists aren't scientists, they are fantasists.
I understand your, um, skepticism. I'm currently looking for a psychologist, and I think I have found one who is also a scientist. If you ever feel like challenging your opinion, I hope you'll http://www.drbobtampa.com/ .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I would like to see a study on the average IQ of psychometricians.
 
  • #33
quasar987 said:
In college, I had a course of 3-D drawing, and I feel like I'm better at imagining and rotating 3-d figures now than i was before.

why do you believe imagining 3-d is something you can or cannot do, but not learn and get better at?

Good question. I suppose I don't have any good reason, aside from the fact that I've always been able to visualize just about anything, including 3-D rotations, pretty easily, without any need for practice. Obviously, that doesn't exactly prove anything.
 
  • #34
loseyourname said:
Good question. I suppose I don't have any good reason, aside from the fact that I've always been able to visualize just about anything, including 3-D rotations, pretty easily, without any need for practice. Obviously, that doesn't exactly prove anything.
There is also the factor of necessity and environment.

Take for example Kim's Game. People are able to improve their memory and their observation skills.

As far as scientific skills, if not exposed to scientific theory or practices, the terminology may become confusing. It was proven a number of years ago that many of the intelligence tests in use favoured upper middle class students however when the wording used in these tests or the subject matter, Ghetto children were often able to answer the questions. (ie. ask a kid about a lab and how one uses advanced equipment to produce a specific solution and he hasn't a clue ... ask him how to cut heroin and he can tell you to the gram)

3D imagery and rotation? Think about make-up and the illusions created by the effects as viewed from all angles... Okay and architect or a draftsman can rotate designs in their minds however a woman can envision abstracts of light, colour and shadow to alter a 3D image to produce an illusion of depth.

Besides, the other theory over depth perception is that women have a problem with distances because men keep telling them that 4" is 8". :biggrin:
 
  • #35
The Smoking Man said:
Besides, the other theory over depth perception is that women have a problem with distances because men keep telling them that 4" is 8". :biggrin:
:smile: :smile: :smile: We're also used to numbers being totally meaningless and arbitrary, such as clothing sizes. Ask a woman if 8 is larger or smaller than 10 and she'll have to ask you which stores you bought each one at. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K