A Merging timelike and spacelike surfaces

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a proposed method for determining boundary length by smoothly merging timelike and spacelike surfaces that are homologous to the boundary and possess a well-defined first derivative at the merging point. A key question raised is whether this merging procedure can be applied in the context of thermal AdS, particularly when the boundary is located at infinity. Participants are exploring the implications of this approach for understanding the geometry of spacetime. The feasibility of this method in thermal AdS could provide insights into the behavior of boundaries in such geometrical frameworks. Overall, the conversation highlights the intersection of mathematical theory and physical applications in the study of spacetime surfaces.
codebpr
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How to merge spacelike and timelike surfaces in the case of thermal AdS?
In the following paper, there is a statement which says:

We propose to determine the boundary length by merging smoothly the timelike and spacelike surfaces in such a way that they are homologous to the boundary and have a well-defined first derivative at the merging point.

Can this procedure be done in the case of thermal AdS, where the boundary is at infinity?


[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01393
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K