Method of Indicators for computing expectation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 8K views
houston07
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have the following problem: Suppose you have a coin that has chance p of landing heads. Suppose you flip the coin n times and let X denote the number of 'head runs' in n flips. A 'head run' is defined as any sequence of heads. For example the sequence HHTHHHHHTTTTHHTHT contains 4 head runs. Given this information, compute E[X] and Var[X].

I cannot understand how to set up the indicator method that will allow me to solve this problem quickly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
houston07 said:
Hi,

I have the following problem: Suppose you have a coin that has chance p of landing heads. Suppose you flip the coin n times and let X denote the number of 'head runs' in n flips. A 'head run' is defined as any sequence of heads. For example the sequence HHTHHHHHTTTTHHTHT contains 4 head runs. Given this information, compute E[X] and Var[X].

I cannot understand how to set up the indicator method that will allow me to solve this problem quickly.
Define [tex]X_i = 1[/tex] if flip i is the start of a run of heads,
[tex]= 0[/tex] otherwise.

To find E[X] you will need to compute [tex]E[\sum X_i][/tex].

To find Var[X] you will need to compute, in addition, [tex]E[\sum X_i X_j][/tex], where the sum runs over all pairs i, j with i < j.
 
Seems interesting, but hard problem. I suspect that the indicator method does not work in case of p [tex]\neq[/tex] 1/2. It is easier to consider a fair coin with p=1/2 at the beginning.
 
After a messy, lengthy calculations (not the indicator method) an unexpectedly simple formula for the E(x) occurred:

E(x)=p*(p+n*q) ; q=1-p

I was shocked! Indeed, there must be a simple probabilistic approach that replaces involved calculations and hard analysis. Maybe really the indicator method. Still needs to think about this problem.
 
Eero said:
After a messy, lengthy calculations (not the indicator method) an unexpectedly simple formula for the E(x) occurred:

E(x)=p*(p+n*q) ; q=1-p

I was shocked! Indeed, there must be a simple probabilistic approach that replaces involved calculations and hard analysis. Maybe really the indicator method. Still needs to think about this problem.

E(X1)=p and E(Xi)=pq for i>1 so E(X) = p+(n-1)pq = p^2 + npq
 
Nice one bpet!

I would not come into this as soon. Do you have a clue how to determine E(Xi*Xj) now, to calculate Var(X)?
 
Eero said:
Nice one bpet!

I would not come into this as soon. Do you have a clue how to determine E(Xi*Xj) now, to calculate Var(X)?

Thanks! Similar way, more cases to consider e.g. j=i, j=i+1, j>i+1.