Methods to describe a data set

  • Thread starter Thread starter antz0r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Set
Click For Summary
To accurately describe a data set of voltage versus time, especially when voltage varies significantly, relying solely on the average may not suffice due to thermal drift affecting measurements. The voltage reflects thrust, which typically hovers around 50mlbf, but thermal effects complicate the representation of this data. A single thrust measurement may not capture the complexity of the data, suggesting the need for additional data or modeling to predict values. Exploring alternative statistical methods or models could provide a more accurate representation of the thrust throughout the cycle. Accurate data description requires considering the nuances introduced by thermal drift and measurement variability.
antz0r
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This might be a simple question but I am trying to find a good method of describing a data set. I have a data set of voltage vs time for a cycle, where voltage varies a lot. Would taking the average of voltage over the entire number of times be a good way of describing everything? Or are there other more accurate methods of getting a single and accurate voltage number for the whole cycle?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Would tell about this more precisely:
where voltage varies a lot.
?
 
The voltage indicates the thrust measurement at that time. So if I convert it to thrust, it would be around 50mlbf most of the times. However, because of thermal effects (ie the instruments heat up), the measurements slowly increase over time and decrease once the device is turned off. The problem is that I don't know the exact amount it drifts because there's really no way to measure it.

I'm trying to get a single thrust measurement number for one run cycle that can describe the data. Due to the thermal drift, it's hard to represent the measurement if I just take the average of all the instantaneous thrust measurements over time. Are there any other methods of describing the data set as accurately as possible?
 
antz0r said:
The voltage indicates the thrust measurement at that time. So if I convert it to thrust, it would be around 50mlbf most of the times. However, because of thermal effects (ie the instruments heat up), the measurements slowly increase over time and decrease once the device is turned off. The problem is that I don't know the exact amount it drifts because there's really no way to measure it.

I'm trying to get a single thrust measurement number for one run cycle that can describe the data. Due to the thermal drift, it's hard to represent the measurement if I just take the average of all the instantaneous thrust measurements over time. Are there any other methods of describing the data set as accurately as possible?

You seem to need MORE data. One single measurement will not give you much to use for graphing or other numeric processing. An engineer-person should probably give you well directed advice. Do you maybe have some way to create a model to predict what value should be found in measurement?
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K