Undergrad Metric for Lambdavacuum EFE - Radial Coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the metric for the Lambdavacuum solution to the Einstein Field Equations (EFE) in radial coordinates. The Minkowski metric is identified as the vacuum field solution without a cosmological constant, while the Schwarzschild metric describes the vacuum field solution around a spherical mass. The de Sitter metric is also discussed, particularly in relation to the cosmological constant, with the final metric expressed as a function of both the Schwarzschild radius and the cosmological constant. The participants provide links to relevant lecture notes and resources for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein Field Equations (EFE)
  • Familiarity with the Minkowski metric
  • Knowledge of the Schwarzschild metric
  • Concept of the cosmological constant (Λ)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the de Sitter metric and its implications in cosmology
  • Review the derivation of the Schwarzschild metric with cosmological constant
  • Examine Carroll's lecture notes on General Relativity, particularly equations from section 8.7
  • Explore the mathematical properties of metrics in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focused on general relativity, cosmology, and the mathematical formulation of gravitational theories.

redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
I am having trouble finding the equation for the metric for the Lambdavacuum solution to the EFE in radial coordinates. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The metric doesn't change with the addition of the Lambda term. So, it's the same as the metric of a 2-sphere. Can you get that?

EDIT: I didn't see you were looking for a vacuum solution. The metric should then be the Minkowski Metric.
 
Last edited:
The vacuum field solution of empty space with no cosmological constant produces the Minkowski metric:

\begin{equation}

d\vec{s}^2=d\vec{x}^2-dt^2

\end{equation}In radial coordinates, the vacuum field solution around a spherical mass produces the Schwarzschild metric:

\begin{equation}

\begin{split}

d\vec{s}^2&=\left(\frac{1}{1-\frac{\vec{r}_s}{\vec{r}}} \right) d\vec{r}^2 + \vec{r}^2 \left(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta d\varphi^2 \right) -\left(1 - \frac{\vec{r}_s}{\vec{r}} \right) dt^2

\end{split}

\end{equation}Which as ##\vec{r}\to \infty## becomes the Minkowski metric, where ##\vec{x}=[\vec{r}, \theta, \varphi]##.I am still not sure how to write metric of the Lambdavacuum solution. What is ##d\vec{s}^2## as a function of ##\Lambda## and ##g_{\mu \nu}##?.
 
redtree said:
I am having trouble finding the equation for the metric for the Lambdavacuum solution to the EFE in radial coordinates. Any suggestions?
Also look at Carroll's lecture notes from eq. 8.7 onward and you will see the metric and how it relates to Einstein's field equations, including the cosmological constant.
 
redtree said:
I am still not sure how to write metric of the Lambdavacuum solution

It's the de Sitter metric; see here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_space

If by "radial coordinates" you mean coordinates with a radial coordinate ##r## defined the way it is in Schwarzschild coordinates (such that the area of a 2-sphere at radial coordinate ##r## is ##4 \pi r^2##), those are the "static coordinates" described at that link.
 
That's great. Thanks!

Given:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
d\vec{s}^2&=\left(\frac{1}{1-\frac{\vec{r}_s}{\vec{r}}-\frac{\Lambda \vec{r}^2}{3}} \right) d\vec{r}^2 + \vec{r}^2 \left(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta d\varphi^2 \right) -\left(1 - \frac{\vec{r}_s}{\vec{r}}-\frac{\Lambda \vec{r}^2}{3} \right) dt^2
\end{split}
\end{equation}

Am I correct in the following, where ##\tilde{\infty}## denotes complex infinity?:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\lim_{\vec{r}\to \infty} d\vec{s}&=\tilde{\infty}
\end{split}
\end{equation}

With a singularity at the transition between real and imaginary values for ##\vec{s}##.
 
Last edited:
PeterDonis said:
It's the de Sitter metric; see here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_space

If by "radial coordinates" you mean coordinates with a radial coordinate ##r## defined the way it is in Schwarzschild coordinates (such that the area of a 2-sphere at radial coordinate ##r## is ##4 \pi r^2##), those are the "static coordinates" described at that link.
Sure, this is what I quoted for ##m=0## (i.e., ##r_{\text{S}}=0##).
 
Given:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
d\vec{s}^2&=\left(\frac{1}{1-\frac{\vec{r}_s}{\vec{r}}-\frac{\Lambda \vec{r}^2}{3}} \right) d\vec{r}^2 + \vec{r}^2 \left(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta d\varphi^2 \right) -\left(1 - \frac{\vec{r}_s}{\vec{r}}-\frac{\Lambda \vec{r}^2}{3} \right) dt^2
\end{split}
\end{equation}

Am I right in understanding ##\Lambda## is negative such that ##\frac{\Lambda \vec{r}^2}{3}## is positive?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
922
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K