Metric Spaces - Fixed Point Theorem (Apostol, Theorem 4.48)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the proof of the Fixed Point Theorem for a metric space as presented in Apostol's Theorem 4.48. Participants clarify the application of the triangle inequality in deriving the relation $$d(p_m, p_n) \le \sum_{k=n}^{m-1} d(p_{k+1}, p_k)$$. It is established that the triangle inequality holds for any metric space, allowing repeated application to achieve the desired result. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the triangle inequality as a fundamental axiom in metric spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the triangle inequality in mathematical contexts
  • Knowledge of Apostol's Theorem 4.48
  • Basic skills in mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of metric spaces in detail
  • Review the application of the triangle inequality in various proofs
  • Explore additional examples of the Fixed Point Theorem
  • Investigate other axioms that define metric spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced calculus, and anyone studying fixed point theorems and metric space properties will benefit from this discussion.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I need help with the proof of the Fixed Point Theorem for a metric space (S,d) (Apostol Theorem 4.48)

The Fixed Point Theorem and its proof read as follows:View attachment 3901
View attachment 3902
In the above proof Apostol writes:

" ... ... Using the triangle inequality we find for $$m \gt n$$,

$$d(p_m, p_n) \le \sum_{k=n}^{m-1} d(p_{k+1}, p_k ) $$ ... ... "I am unsure of how (exactly!) Apostol uses the triangle inequality to derive the relation

$$d(p_m, p_n) \le \sum_{k=n}^{m-1} d(p_{k+1}, p_k ) $$

Can someone please help by showing how (formally and rigorously) this is derived?

I presume that Apostol is using the generalised form of the triangle inequality which he describes as the following (see page 13):

$$| x_1 + x_2 + \ ... \ ... \ + x_n | \le |x_1| + |x_2| + \ ... \ ... \ + |x_n|$$

... ... but ... ... I cannot see how he derives a situation where:

$$d(p_m, p_n) = d(p_{n+1}, p_n) + d(p_{n+2}, p_{n+1}) + \ ... \ ... \ + d( p_m, p_{m-1} )$$

so that the triangle inequality can be applied ... ...

Hope that someone can help,

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

The triangle inequality is valid for any metric, not only the absolute value, this is, if $(X,d)$ is a metric space, then $d(x,z)\leq d(x,y)+d(y,z)$ for all $x,y,z\in X$.

Now he applies this as many times as needed.

$d(p_{m},p_{n})\leq d(p_{n},p_{n+1})+d(p_{n+1},p_{m})$
$d(p_{n+1},p_{m})\leq d(p_{n+1},p_{n+2})+d(p_{n+2},p_{m})$

and so he can conclude $d(p_{m},p_{n})\leq \displaystyle\sum_{k=n}^{m-1}d(p_{k+1},p_{k})$
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi Peter,

The triangle inequality is valid for any metric, not only the absolute value, this is, if $(X,d)$ is a metric space, then $d(x,z)\leq d(x,y)+d(y,z)$ for all $x,y,z\in X$.

Now he applies this as many times as needed.

$d(p_{m},p_{n})\leq d(p_{n},p_{n+1})+d(p_{n+1},p_{m})$
$d(p_{n+1},p_{m})\leq d(p_{n+1},p_{n+2})+d(p_{n+2},p_{m})$

and so he can conclude $d(p_{m},p_{n})\leq \displaystyle\sum_{k=n}^{m-1}d(p_{k+1},p_{k})$
Thanks Fallen Angel ...

Appreciate your help ... ...

Peter
 
I just want to add that the triangle inequality is an axiom for a metric. Sorry Peter if this sounds redundant.
 
Euge said:
I just want to add that the triangle inequality is an axiom for a metric. Sorry Peter if this sounds redundant.

Hi Euge,

No ... that does not sound redundant at all ...

Your post is relevant and most helpful,

Thanks,

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K