Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Metric Tensor and The Minkowski metric

  1. Dec 17, 2017 #1
    Hi,

    I have seen the general form for the metric tensor in general relativity, but I don't understand how that math would create a Minkowski metric with the diagonal matrix {-1 +1 +1 +1}. I assume that using the kronecker delta to create the metric would produce a matrix that has all positive 1s in the diagonal. Are these numbers arbitrarily picked for certain "special" spaces?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 17, 2017 #2

    Orodruin

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    In relativity you use an indefinite metric (also called pseudo-metric) which has signature +--- or -+++, depending on convention. The Kronecker delta is positive definite and therefore you cannot find any coordinate system where the metric used in GR or SR is the Kronecker delta (or, more accurately, where the metric is diagonal with ones on the diagonal - the Kronecker delta really is a (1,1) tensor, not a (0,2) tensor like the metric - however, you usually encounter it as the metric in Cartesian coordinates on a Euclidean space as it does not matter whether indices are covariant and contravariant in such coordinates).
     
  4. Dec 17, 2017 #3

    Ibix

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Different numbers (well, functions) give different spaces - or can do. In principle you slot a stress-energy tensor into the Einstein field equation and solve the resulting system of differential equations to find the metric tensor. In practice that's quite difficult, and there is quite a lot of gauge freedom which means two different metric tensors can describe the same spacetime, just in different coordinates. You can always pick coordinates so that at one chosen point the metric is Minkowski. So everywhere the signature is -+++ (or +---). It will never be anything else.

    The reason we picked the Minkowski metric is that Minkowski noticed that it is invariant under Lorentz transforms. So what the Lorentz transforms are telling you is that you live in a universe where the basic geometry is Minkowski, not Euclidean.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Metric Tensor and The Minkowski metric
  1. Minkowski metric (Replies: 6)

  2. The minkowski metric (Replies: 3)

  3. Minkowski metric (Replies: 8)

  4. Minkowski Metric (Replies: 36)

Loading...