Metric Tensor Questions: Understanding Hartle's "Gravity" Example 7.2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on Example 7.2 from Hartle's "Gravity," specifically addressing the metric tensor for a sphere at the north pole. The line element is defined as dS² = a²(dθ² + sin²θ dφ²), with transformations provided for θ and φ. The participants clarify how to derive dθ and dφ using partial derivatives and how to express the line element in matrix form. The final metric tensor is represented as a 2x2 matrix, facilitating further calculations in general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric tensors in general relativity
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and transformations
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and Taylor series expansions
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, particularly matrix representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the metric tensor in spherical coordinates
  • Learn about the application of Taylor series in physics
  • Explore the relationship between coordinate transformations and metric tensors
  • Investigate the implications of metric tensors in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students of general relativity, physicists working with metric tensors, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the mathematical foundations of gravitational theory.

narfarnst
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi. This is example 7.2 from Hartle's "Gravity" if you happen to have it lying around.

Metric of a sphere at the north pole
The line element of a sphere (with radius a) is [tex]dS^{2}=a^{2}(d\theta^{2}+sin^{2}\theta d\phi ^{2})[/tex]
(In [tex](\theta , \phi )[/tex] coordinates).
At the north pole [tex]\theta = 0[/tex] and at the N. pole, the metric doesn't look like a flat space, dS2=dx2+dy2.
Using the coordinate transformations: [tex]x= a(\theta cos \phi , y= a \theta sin \phi[/tex] show that the metric [tex]g_{\alpha\beta} = (1-2y^{2}/(3a^{2}) | 2xy/(3a^{2}, 2xy/(3a^{2}) | 1-2x^{2}/(3a^{2}) )[/tex]

Where [tex]g_{\alpha\beta}[/tex] is suppose to be a 2x2 matrix.

The book tells you that you rewrite [tex]\theta=1/a \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} , \phi = tan^{-1}(\frac{y}{x})[/tex]
And then use taylor series to expand and keep the first few terms. But it doesn't show the work.

I get the idea, but I'm not sure how the math works out.
So what I'd want to do is, from [tex]\theta[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex], find [tex]d\theta[/tex] and [tex]d\phi[/tex], and then plug them into the line element.
But I have two questions.
1. How do I find [tex]d\theta[/tex] and [tex]d\phi[/tex].
2. How do I go from that line element to a 2x2 matrix? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For 1., you want to use

[tex] \theta=1/a \sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} , \phi = tan^{-1}(\frac{y}{x})[/tex]

to write

[tex]d\theta = \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} dx + \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y} dy,[/tex]

with an analogous expression for [tex]d\phi[/tex]. This will give you a 2x2 system of equations that you can solve for [tex]dx,dy[/tex] to rewrite the line element.

For 2, note that

[tex] dS^{2}=a^{2}(d\theta^{2}+sin^{2}\theta d\phi ^{2}) = \begin{pmatrix} d\theta & d\phi \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} a^2 & 0 \\ 0 & a^2 \sin^2\theta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} d\theta \\ d\phi \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

If you go through the trouble to express the results of part 1 in vector form, it might make computing the metric a bit faster.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K