I Metric Transformation b/w Inertial Frames: Analyzing Effects

Jufa
Messages
101
Reaction score
15
TL;DR Summary
Found something weird when calculating the transformation due to a boost.
The metric tensor in an inertial frame is ## \eta = diag(-1, 1)##. Where I amb dealing with only 1-D space. The metric tranformation rule after a crtain coordinate chane is the following:

$$ g_{\mu \nu} = \frac{\partial x^\alpha}{\partial x'^{\mu }} \frac{\partial x^\beta}{\partial x'\nu } \eta_{\alpha \beta} $$
with ##x^0 = t## and ##x^1= x##

Given the particular form of ## \eta ## we obtain for ## \mu = \nu = 0 ## :

$$ g_{00} = -\Big(\frac{\partial t}{\partial t' }\Big)^2 + \Big(\frac{\partial x}{\partial t' }\Big)^2 = -\gamma ^2 + v^2\gamma^2 = \frac{v^2-1}{1-v^2/c^2} \neq -1 = \eta_{00}$$

So I get that after a Lorentz boost one of the metric's elements has changed.
Where am I wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be mixing units where ##c = 1## with units where ##c \neq 1##.
 
Orodruin said:
You seem to be mixing units where ##c = 1## with units where ##c \neq 1##.
Oh yes. It is definitely that. Many thanks.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...

Similar threads

Back
Top