Michael Douglas gets in our good books

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Michael Douglas advocates for increased exploration of alternatives to string theory, emphasizing the need for a balanced perspective in theoretical physics. This sentiment aligns with Andy Strominger's remarks at the Toronto Strings '05 conference, where he acknowledged the value of both string theory and non-string quantum gravity (QG). Douglas's position marks a shift from the monopolistic views often held by string theorists, suggesting a more inclusive approach to theoretical research. The discussion highlights the potential for collaboration with non-string theorists, such as Hanno Sahlmann and Etera Livine, within the Rutgers theory group.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory and its criticisms
  • Familiarity with quantum gravity concepts
  • Knowledge of the current landscape of theoretical physics research
  • Awareness of key figures in the field, such as Michael Douglas and Andy Strominger
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of alternatives to string theory in theoretical physics
  • Explore the contributions of non-string quantum gravity researchers like Hanno Sahlmann and Etera Livine
  • Investigate the role of academic institutions, such as Rutgers, in shaping theoretical physics
  • Watch Michael Douglas's seminar at the Perimeter Institute for insights on current research trends
USEFUL FOR

Theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers interested in the evolution of string theory and alternative approaches in quantum gravity.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
At the end of a recent talk he gave at Perimeter
(on the string landscape and the intractability of related computation)
Michael Douglas said

"I certainly think more people should be working on alternatives to string theory..."

This struck me as a nice sensible thing for a prominent string theorist to be saying---unlike what we may have come to expect from others who have often claimed that string theory is the only this or the only that or "our best hope", or who have argued that none of the alternatives can possibly succeed. There may be a wish to be the "only game in town" which leads some to a kind of monopolistic catechism.

One sign of change was that Harvard's Andy Strominger took quite a different stance last summer at Toronto Strings '05 conference. He said there were good reasons why one might choose NOT to do string, and want to pursue alternatives. He indicated that the problem he encountered was naive string optimism among Harvard grad students (whom he presumably would need to douse with cold water) and not the opposite. Strominger took a balanced view that there were interesting problems to explore in both areas---string and non-string QG.

'Til today I hadn't heard Michael Douglas take a similiarly balanced position. So I welcome it very much. Especially since Douglas has been one of the more hopeful of those researching the Landscape. The 10200 or 10500 different versions of physics which string thinkers so far have found no way to select from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Before I become an all out fan of Michael Douglas I will wait to see if the Rutgers group invites some young non-string quantum gravitist to join.

the Rutgers theory group is top notch and that is partly Douglas doing. He has to be one of those who built the department up to be (at least in stringy pursuits) world class. I will see if he puts his research support money where his mouth is ("more people should be working on alternatives") and invites someone like Hanno Sahlmann, or Etera Livine, or Bianca Dittrich, or Laurent Freidel to give a talk at Rutgers---introducing their work.

If you want to watch Douglas seminar talk go to
http://streamer.perimeterinstitute.ca:81/mediasite/viewer/FrontEnd/Front.aspx?&shouldResize=False

and select the "seminar series"----you will see Douglas on the seminar menu among the most recent talks.
If you are in a hurry to get to the end, where people ask him questions, then when the talk starts, you skip to the last slide:
you just select "slide list" and the last page of slide list, and scroll to the last slide and start from that point. So you get like the last 5 or so minutes of the talk.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K