MHB Michael's question at Yahoo Answers concerning normally distributed data

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Distributed
AI Thread Summary
To determine the SAT math score cutoff for the top 29% of students, a z-score of approximately 0.55 corresponds to a raw score of about 575. For the top 15%, the z-score is approximately 1.04, resulting in a cutoff score of around 635. These calculations utilize the properties of the normal distribution and require converting z-scores to raw scores using the mean and standard deviation. The methods discussed include consulting standard normal distribution charts and using numerical integration. The final scores for the respective percentiles are 575 for the top 29% and 635 for the top 15%.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Help With A Statistics Problem! 10 Points!?

SAT math scores are scaled so that they are approximately normal, with a mean of 506 and a standard deviation of 124.
A college wants to send letter to students scoring in the top 29% on the math portion of the exam. What SAT math score should they use as the dividing line between those who get letters and those who do not?

What score would they use as the dividing line if they choose to send letters to only the top 15% instead?

Here is a link to the question:

Help With A Statistics Problem! 10 Points!? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so that the OP may find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Michael's question at Yahoo! Answers concerning normally distrubted data

Hello Michael,

For the first part of the question, to find the score which divides the top 29% from the remainder, we need to consult our chart for areas under the standard normal curve. We are looking for the z-score with an area of 0.21, since 50% will be to the left of the mean, 0.21 will be between the mean and the z-score we want, and the remaining 0.29 will be to the right of this z-score.

Consulting the chart, we find this z-score is closest to 0.55. If we use numeric integration, we find it is closer to 0.553384719556.

I used my TI-89 Titanium and the command:

solve((1/√(2π))∫(e^(-t^2/2),t,0,z)=0.21,z)

Now we wish to convert this z-score to a raw data score, via the relation:

$\displaystyle z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}$

Solve for $x$ to get:

$\displaystyle x=z\sigma+\mu$

We are given:

$\displaystyle \sigma=124,\,\mu=506$

and so:

$\displaystyle x\approx0.553384719556\cdot124+506=574.619705224944\approx575$

So, scores which are at least 575 would be in the top 29%.

Using the same method to determine the bottom score for the top 15%, we may use the command:

solve((1/√(2π))∫(e^(-t^2/2),t,0,z)=0.35,z)

to get:

$z\approx1.03643338949$

and so:

$\displaystyle x\approx1.03643338949\cdot124+506=634.5177402967599\approx635$

So, scores which are at least 635 would be in the top 15%.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top