Michelson-Gale-Pearson Refutation of Stokes-Planck - Help

  1. I'm hoping for some help in understanding how the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment in 1925 is held as a refutation of the Stokes-Planck theory of gravitational aether drag.

    If I understand the Stokes-Planck theory correctly, complete dragging of the aether near a sufficiently massive body (diminishing at distance, in accordance to the inverse square law as it applies to gravitational force) would be essentially indistinguishable from a complete dragging model. Wouldn't it also be indistinguishable from a non-aetheric model?
    Didn't Michelson-Gale-Pearson support that?

    What am I missing?

    Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. UltrafastPED

    UltrafastPED 1,916
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This should be posted in the Special & General Relativity forum.
     
  4. I wasn't sure, because the Stokes-Planck theory was a classical interpretation that pre-dated Relativity - and, if it were accepted, would have stood in opposition to Relativity.

    Can I move it, or does a moderator have to?
     
  5. Can a moderator move this to the Relativity sub-forum, please?
    Maybe it will get a response there.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thead via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

0
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar discussions for: Michelson-Gale-Pearson Refutation of Stokes-Planck - Help
Loading...