hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

usually the density operator for the microcanonical ensemble is given by

[tex]\rho = \sum_n p_n|n><n|[/tex]

where |n> are energy eigenstates and p_n is the probability that our system is in this state.

p_n = const. if the energy corresponding to |n> is in the energy inteval (E,E+∆E), otherwise p_n =0.

I.e. we assume, our system is composed of energy-eigenstates. Why is this allowed? Why don't we have to assume, that our system is composed of general quantum states? (with the same conditions for p_n, that is, p_n should be const. if the energy (or much better the expectation value for the energy, since we have no energy eigenstates anymore) corresponding to the general quantum state is within the energy interval)

--derivator

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Microcanonical ensemble, density operator

Loading...

Similar Threads for Microcanonical ensemble density | Date |
---|---|

A Value of observable in statistical ensemble interpretation | Apr 11, 2017 |

I Decomposing a density matrix of a mixed ensemble | Apr 8, 2017 |

I Virtual statistical ensembles | Jan 23, 2017 |

I Ensembles and density matrices - I don't get it | Oct 17, 2016 |

Microcanonical ensemble density matrix | Nov 18, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**