MHB Minimize r/(sqrt(2)) Distance from (2r, 0) & (0, 2r)

  • Thread starter Thread starter leprofece
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max
leprofece
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
find a point above the circle: x2 + y2 = r2 so that the sum of the squares of their distances to points (2r, 0) and (0, 2r) it is the smallest

answer (r/(sqrt(2)), r/(sqrt(2)) )

according to the problem
after elevating to the square
(x-2r)2+y2 +x2+(y-2r)2

Solving
2(x)2-4rx-8ry+2y2

now y2= r-x2

introducing in one and derivating i don't get the answer
because 8 ry must be 8r( sqrt r-x2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leprofece said:
find a point above the circle: x2 + y2 = r2 so that the sum of the squares of their distances to points (2r, 0) and (0, 2r) it is the smallest

answer (r/(sqrt(2)), r/(sqrt(2)) )
Why not $(r,r)$?

leprofece said:
after elevating to the square
(x-2r)2+y2 +x2+(y-2r)2

Solving
2(x)2-4rx-8ry+2y2
Why is this expression not symmetric w.r.t. $x$ and $y$?
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Why not $(r,r)$?

Why is this expression not symmetric w.r.t. $x$ and $y$?

I don't know this is my thinking maybe it is easier for you another way
 
You wrote, "Find a point above the circle", but the supposed answer is a point on the circle. Since the segment connecting $(2r,0)$ and $(0,2r)$ does not intersect the circle, the middle of this segment is the point that minimizes the required expression.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
You wrote, "Find a point above the circle", but the supposed answer is a point on the circle. Since the segment connecting $(2r,0)$ and $(0,2r)$ does not intersect the circle, the middle of this segment is the point that minimizes the required expression.

yEAH IT IS on NOT ABOVE
 
leprofece said:
after elevating to the square
(x-2r)2+y2 +x2+(y-2r)2

Solving
2(x)2-4rx-8ry+2y2
This expression should be
\[
2x^2+2y^2-4r(x+y)
\]
As I said, it is symmetric with respect to $x$ and $y$. Since $x^2+y^2=r^2$, it can be rewritten as $2r^2-4r(x+y)$. Minimizing it is equivalent to maximizing $x+y$. One thing that comes to mind is representing this as $\cos\varphi+\sin\varphi$ where $0\le\varphi<2\pi$. Differentiating this with respect to $\varphi$ and equating to 0, we get $-\sin\varphi+\cos\varphi=0$, or $\tan\varphi=1$, which means $\varphi=\pi/4$ or $\varphi=5\pi/4$. In both cases, $x=y$.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
This expression should be
\[
2x^2+2y^2-4r(x+y)
\]
As I said, it is symmetric with respect to $x$ and $y$. Since $x^2+y^2=r^2$, it can be rewritten as $2r^2-4r(x+y)$. Minimizing it is equivalent to maximizing $x+y$. One thing that comes to mind is representing this as $\cos\varphi+\sin\varphi$ where $0\le\varphi<2\pi$. Differentiating this with respect to $\varphi$ and equating to 0, we get $-\sin\varphi+\cos\varphi=0$, or $\tan\varphi=1$, which means $\varphi=\pi/4$ or $\varphi=5\pi/4$. In both cases, $x=y$.

in my book appears I´d really appreciatte that
or I really appreciatte that then
 
Back
Top