# B Can you find orbital velocity from circle equation y^2+x^2=r^2?

1. Jun 30, 2017

### victorhugo

Maintaining R as the constant hypotenuse in the triangle formed by x and y coordinates in a 'perfect' circle,
r2=x2+y2
r2=x2+y2

So knowing that in 9.8 metres above ground it will take 1 second for an object to fall, I tried to find how many metres in the X direction an object must cover in 1 second before it falls 9.8 metres by

x2=r2 - y2
& y2 = r - 9.8
r = 6 371 000
thus x = 11 174.6 m/s ??

it's incorrect because if we use the formula derived from matching force from centripetal acceleration and gravitational acceleration at height r, it does not match:
( geometric proof shows that v-u / v = Dr & D=vt
plug and simplify, v-u=v2t/r, & a = v-u/t thus a= v2/r)

Since a = g = 9.8, then V = (sqrt) ar = (sqrt) 9.8 x 6 371 000 = 7901.63..... m/s

2. Jun 30, 2017

### QuantumQuest

It is quite difficult - at least to me, to follow your notation / equations. I'd recommend using latex in order to see clearly what you are asking. Also a sketch would be helpful.

3. Jun 30, 2017

### victorhugo

Sorry I'll try make it simpler:

For the changing X and Y coordinates on a planet (assuming it's perfectly spherical), (R= Radius of a circle) R2=x2 + y2

(Assuming gravity = 9.8 m/s/s) If you fall in the Y position by 9.8 metres, it will take 1 second.
What I tried to do is cover enough distance in the X direction such that it never reaches the ground.
Change in Y = R - 9.8. Lets assume R is that of Earth, 6 371 000 Metres

In order for the object to still be at radius R above the centre, then it must've covered an X distance of:
X= √R2 - (R - 9.8)2 = 11 174.6 m/s

But that's not the orbital speed. The orbit speed is:
a = v2 r

R= 6 371 000
a = 9.8
v= 7 901.63... m/s

4. Jun 30, 2017

### Chandra Prayaga

What made you feel that it would fall 9.8 m in one second. with a vertical acceleration of 9.8 m/s2?

5. Jun 30, 2017

### victorhugo

Not sure, i skipped the logical thinking and went to easy algebra thinking, I thought if i plugged in,
a= d / t / t
d = at^2
= 9.8...
Now that I think about it. at t=1 it has only just reached 9.8 m/s. thus, from t=0 -> t=1, the average velocity must be 9.8/2 = 4.9, thus in 1 second it has fallen 4.9 metres
so D = V at t=0 + V at t=1 / 2....
using this average velocity over the first second, then the equation works!
thank you :)

But why is a = d / t / t, = 1/at^2 and not at^2?

6. Jun 30, 2017

### QuantumQuest

Sorry but this expression equates all sorts of things and I can really make no sense of it, in order to help. If you can state clearly what you ask it would be fine.

7. Jun 30, 2017

### Chandra Prayaga

Let us start with what kind of background you have (high school, undergraduate, etc), and at what level we are going to work on this problem.
In your last post: d = at2 is not correct.

8. Jul 2, 2017

### victorhugo

Only High School, and starting university in 2 weeks.

In the definition of acceleration, the change in velocity per unit time, is Δ(D/T) / T
If I simplify it, I think it should be: D/T / T/1 = D/T x 1/T = D/T2
I'm guessing I'm missing something to do with it being a change in velocity [ (D/T)1 - (D/T)2 / T ] ?

Oh yea i'm only starting to learn calculus now. Since I have no math background (Although I got a perfect mark in my maths class it was all basic things like world related things like reading graphs and financial problems) I'm still wrapping my head around doing trigonometry, geometry and more advanced algebra.

9. Jul 2, 2017

### victorhugo

After drawing some graphs on paper, I found i was wrong.

In Velocity / Time graph of slope = 10 (therefore acceleration = 10), the distance travelled at
t=1, is the average velocity from t=0 to t=1 ( because at t=1 it has only JUST reached a velocity of 10m/s, gradually) is 0 + 10 / 2 = 5
t=2, = 10 + 20 / 2 = 15
t=3, = 20 + 30 / 2 = 25

so at t=3s, d= 45m, for an acceleration of a=10m/s/s

Now I'm working on simplifying this consistent pattern...

10. Jul 3, 2017

### Chandra Prayaga

Looks like you are getting there. Good for you.