MHB Minimize Total Length of Cables: Estimate Minimum Value?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cable Length
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

How to estimate the minimum value?

A point P needs to be located somewhere on the line AD so that the total length L of cables linking P to the points A, B, and C is minimized (see the figure). Estimate the minimum value of L to two decimals.

View attachment 2123

So far I have:

dL/dx=1 + ((x-5)/(sqrt(29-10 x+x^2))) + ((x-5)/(sqrt(50-10 x+x^2)))

What is the next step??

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 

Attachments

  • lavenderv.png
    lavenderv.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 113
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Lavender V,

Let's let $0\le x\le 5$ represent the length of segment $\overline{DP}$ in meters. And so the total length of cable as a function of $x$ is then obtained via the Pythagorean theorem as:

$$L(x)=(5-x)+\sqrt{x^2+2^2}+\sqrt{x^2+3^2}$$

Now, we may differentiate with respect to $x$ and equate the result to zero to obtain the critical value(s):

$$L'(x)=-1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+4}}+\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+9}}=0$$

Now, since we are thankfully allowed to approximate, we may use Newton's method here to approximate the root of this equation.

Let:

$$f(x)=-1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+4}}+\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+9}}$$

We need to compute the first derivative, and so for the last two terms, consider:

$$g(x)=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+k}}$$

Using the quotient, power and chain rules, we obtain:

$$g'(x)=\frac{\sqrt{x^2+k}(1)-x\dfrac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+k}}}{\left(\sqrt{x^2+k} \right)^2}=\frac{k}{\left(x^2+k \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}$$

And so we may conclude that:

$$f'(x)=\frac{4}{\left(x^2+4 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}+\frac{9}{\left(x^2+9 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}$$

Newton's method gives us the recursion:

$$x_{n+1}=x_{n}-\frac{f\left(x_n \right)}{f'\left(x_n \right)}$$

And so using the definition of $f$ and its derivative, we have:

$$x_{n+1}=x_{n}-\frac{-1+\dfrac{x_n}{\sqrt{x_n^2+4}}+\dfrac{x_n}{\sqrt{x_n^2+9}}}{\dfrac{4}{\left(x_n^2+4 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}+\dfrac{9}{\left(x_n^2+9 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}}$$

Now, using a computer or CAS, and $x_0=1$, we find:

$$x_1\approx1.36825580018177$$

$$x_2\approx1.40658793851904$$

$$x_3\approx1.40699724822532$$

$$x_4\approx1.40699729457262$$

$$x_5\approx1.40699729457262$$

This is accurate to 15 digits, more than enough to get an approximation for the minimum of $L$ to two decimal places. Now, if we note that:

$$f'(x)=L''(x)>0$$

For all real values of $x$, then by the second derivative test, we may conclude that this critical value is at the global minimum, and we need not check the boundaries.

Thus, we may conclude:

$$L_{\min}\approx L(1.40699729457262)\approx9.35\text{ m}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top