MHB Minimize Total Length of Cables: Estimate Minimum Value?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cable Length
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on estimating the minimum total length of cables connecting point P to points A, B, and C using calculus. The total length function is defined as L(x) = (5-x) + √(x²+2²) + √(x²+3²). By differentiating L with respect to x and applying Newton's method, the critical point is found to be approximately x = 1.407, leading to a minimum cable length of L_min ≈ 9.35 meters. The second derivative test confirms this critical point is a global minimum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation and Newton's method.
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem for calculating distances.
  • Knowledge of critical points and the second derivative test in optimization.
  • Experience with computational tools or CAS for numerical approximations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Newton's method for root-finding in more depth.
  • Learn about optimization techniques in calculus, including the use of second derivatives.
  • Explore the application of the Pythagorean theorem in real-world problems.
  • Investigate numerical methods for approximating solutions to equations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and professionals involved in optimization problems, particularly those dealing with cable length minimization and calculus applications.

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

How to estimate the minimum value?

A point P needs to be located somewhere on the line AD so that the total length L of cables linking P to the points A, B, and C is minimized (see the figure). Estimate the minimum value of L to two decimals.

View attachment 2123

So far I have:

dL/dx=1 + ((x-5)/(sqrt(29-10 x+x^2))) + ((x-5)/(sqrt(50-10 x+x^2)))

What is the next step??

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 

Attachments

  • lavenderv.png
    lavenderv.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 129
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Lavender V,

Let's let $0\le x\le 5$ represent the length of segment $\overline{DP}$ in meters. And so the total length of cable as a function of $x$ is then obtained via the Pythagorean theorem as:

$$L(x)=(5-x)+\sqrt{x^2+2^2}+\sqrt{x^2+3^2}$$

Now, we may differentiate with respect to $x$ and equate the result to zero to obtain the critical value(s):

$$L'(x)=-1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+4}}+\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+9}}=0$$

Now, since we are thankfully allowed to approximate, we may use Newton's method here to approximate the root of this equation.

Let:

$$f(x)=-1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+4}}+\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+9}}$$

We need to compute the first derivative, and so for the last two terms, consider:

$$g(x)=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+k}}$$

Using the quotient, power and chain rules, we obtain:

$$g'(x)=\frac{\sqrt{x^2+k}(1)-x\dfrac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+k}}}{\left(\sqrt{x^2+k} \right)^2}=\frac{k}{\left(x^2+k \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}$$

And so we may conclude that:

$$f'(x)=\frac{4}{\left(x^2+4 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}+\frac{9}{\left(x^2+9 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}$$

Newton's method gives us the recursion:

$$x_{n+1}=x_{n}-\frac{f\left(x_n \right)}{f'\left(x_n \right)}$$

And so using the definition of $f$ and its derivative, we have:

$$x_{n+1}=x_{n}-\frac{-1+\dfrac{x_n}{\sqrt{x_n^2+4}}+\dfrac{x_n}{\sqrt{x_n^2+9}}}{\dfrac{4}{\left(x_n^2+4 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}+\dfrac{9}{\left(x_n^2+9 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}}$$

Now, using a computer or CAS, and $x_0=1$, we find:

$$x_1\approx1.36825580018177$$

$$x_2\approx1.40658793851904$$

$$x_3\approx1.40699724822532$$

$$x_4\approx1.40699729457262$$

$$x_5\approx1.40699729457262$$

This is accurate to 15 digits, more than enough to get an approximation for the minimum of $L$ to two decimal places. Now, if we note that:

$$f'(x)=L''(x)>0$$

For all real values of $x$, then by the second derivative test, we may conclude that this critical value is at the global minimum, and we need not check the boundaries.

Thus, we may conclude:

$$L_{\min}\approx L(1.40699729457262)\approx9.35\text{ m}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K