Minimum angle required for resolution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the minimum angle required for resolution using a radio telescope with a specified diameter and frequency. The context is based on the application of a formula related to wave properties and telescope design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the formula θmin = (1.22λ)/D, with attempts to calculate the minimum angle using given values. There are questions regarding potential errors in calculation or interpretation of units.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the calculation and questioning the validity of their results. Some guidance has been offered regarding the simplicity of the calculation, but uncertainty remains about the correctness of the outcome.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the possibility of issues related to significant figures or unit interpretation in their calculations. There is an acknowledgment of the need to recheck the calculations for accuracy.

msk172
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The radio telescope at Arecibo, Puerto Rico, has a reflecting spherical bowl of 295 m diameter. Radio signals can be received and emitted at various frequencies with appropriate antennae at the focal point of the reflecting bowl. At a frequency of 200 MHz, what is the angle between two stars that can barely be resolved?

Homework Equations



θmin= (1.22λ)/D

θmin= minimum angle required for resolution (rad)
λ = wavelength
D = diameter of aperture

The Attempt at a Solution



Should be fairly straightforward but I'm getting hung up on what I am sure is something silly. The equation above should be all that is needed. Just do (1.22*1.5)/295 as specified by the problem for θmin (in radians). I know I must be overlooking something simple, so any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry, this one really is that simple :smile:
 
Heh. Figured as much. I'll keep looking at it, and I'm sure it will come to me eventually. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
What do you mean "it will come to me eventually"?

(1.22*1.5)/295​

You are just a few calculator keystrokes from having the answer. (In radians)
 
Well, 1.22 times the wavelength (1.5m) divided by D (295m) should equal θmin in radians, no? That is how I'm interpreting it, at least.
 
Yes, exactly.
 
Redbelly98 said:
Yes, exactly.

That's what I thought. System says that's incorrect, though.
 
Weird. All I can think is it's either a significant figures or units problem. But with radians, expressing no units should be acceptable. I guess you have rechecked the calculation.

Can't think of anything else, but if I do I'll post here again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K