Minimum resistance to prevent overheating in AC circuit

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a calculation involving minimum resistance to prevent overheating in an AC circuit, where the user calculated resistance (R) as 8.2 ohms using RMS current. There is confusion regarding the answer key, which used the peak current (Io) instead of the RMS current (Irms), leading to a discrepancy. Participants confirm the user's calculation is correct and suggest that the error lies in the answer key, which can happen in educational materials. They recommend consulting the instructor or checking for errata from the book publisher for clarification. The conversation highlights the importance of using the correct current type in AC circuit calculations.
songoku
Messages
2,499
Reaction score
401
Homework Statement
An alternating current supply is connected in series with a resistor R. The variation with time t (measured in seconds) of the current I (measured in amps) in the resistor is given by the expression I = 9.9 sin(380t). To prevent over-heating, the mean power dissipated in resistor R must not exceed 400 W. Calculate the minimum resistance of R
Relevant Equations
mean power = ##I_{rms}^2 \times R##
My calculation: ##400=\left(\frac{9.9}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2 R## and I got R = 8.2 ohm

But the answer key used Io (9.9 A) instead of Irms

Why?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct(8.2Ω). It's a mistake in the 'answer key' - it sometimes happens.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and scottdave
It would only be speculation on my part as to "why" they did not use RMS current. Books make mistakes sometimes. Did you ask your instructor about it? Does the book publisher have a website for errata?
 
scottdave said:
It would only be speculation on my part as to "why" they did not use RMS current. Books make mistakes sometimes. Did you ask your instructor about it? Does the book publisher have a website for errata?
I haven't asked him, I just did the practice myself. The question is not from book, it is given by the teacher and on the last page there is working and answer to help the students.

Thank you very much for the help Steve4Physics and scottdave
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
930
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K