MM ether experiment/length contraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contraction Ether
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Michelson-Morley experiment and the implications of length contraction in the context of special relativity. The equation presented, Δt = t2 - t1 = (2/c)(l2/√(1 - v²/c²) - l1/(1 - v²/c²)), illustrates how time differences arise due to the motion of the Earth relative to the ether. The user concludes that l1 represents the arm aligned with the direction of motion, while l2 pertains to the perpendicular motion. By applying length contraction, the user successfully demonstrates that Δt equals zero, confirming the expected outcome of the experiment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly length contraction.
  • Familiarity with the Michelson-Morley experiment and its historical significance.
  • Knowledge of the equation for time dilation and its derivation.
  • Basic grasp of the concept of ether and its role in classical physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Michelson-Morley experiment equations in detail.
  • Explore the implications of length contraction in various inertial frames.
  • Learn about the historical context and impact of the ether theory on modern physics.
  • Investigate the experimental results and their influence on the development of special relativity.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the foundations of modern physics, particularly those studying the principles of special relativity and the historical experiments that shaped our understanding of space and time.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Ok I have this equations Michelson and Morley used:

[tex]Delta t = t_2 - t_1 = \frac{2}{c}(\frac{{l_2 }}{{\sqrt {1 - \frac{{v^2 }}{{c^2 }}} }} - \frac{{l_1 }}{{1 - \frac{{v^2 }}{{c^2 }}}})[/tex]

I need to show that if the length is contracted along the direction of motion, the result comes out to be 0. My question is, which direction is the direction of motion? I have a feeling its L1...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, take a look at how this formula is derived. The factor of 1 - v^2/c^2 comes from the fact that the Earth moves at v wrt to the ether (take all this with a grain of salt), and the beam moves at c relative to the ether, so in the Earth frame, the beam is chasing after the target in the direction of motion with a relative speed of c - v on the way there, and rushing back towards the beamsplitter with a relative speed of c + v on the way back.. So if you work it out, the time it takes to make a round trip along the arm in the direction of motion is given the the expression involving l1, so obviously l1 is the arm in the direction of motion.

The expression involving l2 is more complicated because this is motion perpendicular to the Earth's motion, which amounts to motion diagonally through the ether.
 
Alright thanks. I needed to use the length contraction to show how delta t would = 0 if applied and it worked! woohoo.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K