Modeling technique for Joule heating

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical modeling of Joule heating in a cantilever beam. Participants explore the relevance of the beam's cantilevered nature, thermal boundary conditions, and heat transfer considerations, including convection losses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks sources for mathematical modeling of Joule heating in a cantilever beam.
  • Another participant questions the relevance of the beam being cantilevered and asks about the thermal boundary conditions at the cantilever end.
  • A participant responds that the cantilevered nature has no practical relevance, noting that voltage connections are at the fixed and free ends.
  • There is a discussion about whether to include heat transfer from the beam to the air, with one participant suggesting that convection losses can be neglected.
  • A differential equation for the system is presented, describing the temperature distribution along the beam, but it remains unclear how to solve it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of the cantilevered configuration and the necessity of including convection losses in the model. The discussion does not reach a consensus on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the assumptions regarding thermal boundary conditions and heat transfer mechanisms, which may affect the modeling approach.

jatin1990
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Good Day, I am looking for mathematical modelling of Joule heating of a simple cantilever beam . Can anybody provide me good source of relevant material.
Thanks in advance.
 
Science news on Phys.org
What is the relevance of the beam being cantilevered? Is it that the beam is extended out into the air? What is the thermal boundary condition at the cantilever end of the beam. Do you need to include the heat transfer from the beam to the air, or is it just that the cantilever end is a heat sink at fixed temperature?

Chet
 
Thanks Chestermiller for reply, "What is the relevance of the beam being cantilevered?" good point there no practical relevance the only thing is V is connected to the fixed end and V0 is connected to the free end. "What is the thermal boundary condition at the cantilever end of the beam." Actually there is another cantilever on the other end , both are connected at the center so we can assume free end surface is loosing heat (equivalent to the actual conduction into the other cantilever) "Do you need to include the heat transfer from the beam to the air" No we can neglect the convection lose.

Thanks.
 
Chestermiller said:
What is the relevance of the beam being cantilevered? Is it that the beam is extended out into the air? What is the thermal boundary condition at the cantilever end of the beam. Do you need to include the heat transfer from the beam to the air, or is it just that the cantilever end is a heat sink at fixed temperature?

Chet

Thanks Chestermiller for reply, "What is the relevance of the beam being cantilevered?" good point there no practical relevance the only thing is V is connected to the fixed end and V0 is connected to the free end. "What is the thermal boundary condition at the cantilever end of the beam." Actually there is another cantilever on the other end , both are connected at the center so we can assume free end surface is loosing heat (equivalent to the actual conduction into the other cantilever) "Do you need to include the heat transfer from the beam to the air" No we can neglect the convection lose.
Thanks.
 
jatin1990 said:
Thanks Chestermiller for reply, "What is the relevance of the beam being cantilevered?" good point there no practical relevance the only thing is V is connected to the fixed end and V0 is connected to the free end. "What is the thermal boundary condition at the cantilever end of the beam." Actually there is another cantilever on the other end , both are connected at the center so we can assume free end surface is loosing heat (equivalent to the actual conduction into the other cantilever) "Do you need to include the heat transfer from the beam to the air" No we can neglect the convection lose.
Thanks.
The differential equation that describes this system is given by:
$$0=k\frac{d^2T}{dx^2}+Q$$
where k is the thermal conductivity, T is the temperature, x is the distance along the beam, and Q is the rate of heat generation per unit volume. Do you know how to solve this for the temperature distribution along the beam?

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K