Modeling Thunderclouds with Point Charges and Conducting Planes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling thunderclouds using two point charges, -q and q, positioned at heights h and d above the Earth's surface, with the Earth modeled as a conducting plane at z=0. The solution involves placing two image charges at -h and -d to satisfy boundary conditions, leading to the derived electric potential equation. The electric field is determined to point in the positive z direction below the cloud, and the safest location is identified where the electric field E vanishes on the surface, represented mathematically by the condition E_z(x,y)=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and point charge models
  • Familiarity with electric field and potential concepts
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in electrostatics
  • Proficiency in vector calculus, specifically gradient operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of image charges in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field visualization techniques
  • Explore the implications of conducting planes in electric fields
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of electric potential from point charges
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as researchers modeling electric fields in atmospheric phenomena.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87

Homework Statement


A thunder cloud can be loosely modeled by two point charges -q and q at heights h and d above the Earth's surface with d > h. Model the Earth's surface as a conducting plane at z=0.
Sketch the Electric field lines (on a plane perpendicular to the earth). Indicate the field below the cloud, at a radial distance r, and far away from the cloud. Considering ##\underline{E}##, where is the safest place to be?

The Attempt at a Solution


To satisfy the boundary conditions (V=0 on surface of earth), two image charges are placed at a distance -h (a +q charge) and -d(a -q charge) from the plane. I have the potential due to all 4 charges as a function of x,y and z, from which I found the electric field as a function of the same variables.

From looking at the sketch, it appears to me that the E field should point in the +ve z direction below the cloud and this is confirmed by my eqn for E.
My expression for V is $$V=\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_o}\left(\frac{1}{(x^2+y^2+(z-d)^2)^{1/2}} - \frac{1}{(x^2+y^2+(z-h)^2)^{1/2}} - \frac{1}{(x^2+y^2+(z+d)^2)^{1/2}} + \frac{1}{(x^2+y^2+(z+h)^2)^{1/2}}\right)$$ and I found E by doing -gradV. (the expression is messier than the potential so I won't post it).. I can draw the general sketch of the field lines emanating form the dipole, but I am not sure if that is what the question requires. Perhaps it wants me to draw the general sketch and then confirm it with my eqn for E at particular points.
The safest place would be the place where E vanishes on the surface, but I am not sure how to express this in words or mathematically. I set ##E_z(x,y)=0## and I obtained a condition on ##r^2 = x^2 + y^2##.

I attached a sketch of my drawing
Many thanks.
 

Attachments

  • dipole.png
    dipole.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 487
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anybody any comments? I should have not drawn the E field below the plane, because the charges there are only there to help establish the boundary conditions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K