Modern Physics - Invariability of Newton's 2nd Law under a GT?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 3K views
PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the form of Newton's Second Law is invariant under:
(a). a Galilean Transformation (GT) in 1-Dimension.
(b). a Galilean Transformation (GT) in 2-Dimensions.
(c). a Galilean Transformation (GT) in 3-Dimensions.

Homework Equations


Newton's Second Law.
[tex] {{\sum_{}^{}}{\vec{F}}} = {m{\vec{a}}}{\,}{\,}{\text{[N.II.L.]}}[/tex]

GT for 1-D
[tex] {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}[/tex]

[tex] {{y}^{\prime}} = {y}[/tex]

[tex] {{z}^{\prime}} = {z}[/tex]

[tex] {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}[/tex]

GT for 2-D
[tex] {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{{v}{\left({\frac{x}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}[/tex]
[tex] {{y}^{\prime}} = {{y}-{{v}{\left({\frac{y}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}[/tex]
[tex] {{z}^{\prime}} = {z}[/tex]

[tex] {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}[/tex]

GT for 3-D
[tex] {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{{v}{\left({\frac{x}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}+{z^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}[/tex]
[tex] {{y}^{\prime}} = {{y}-{{v}{\left({\frac{y}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}+{z^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}[/tex]
[tex] {{z}^{\prime}} = {{z}-{{v}{\left({\frac{z}{\sqrt{{x^2}+{y^2}+{z^2}}}}\right)}{t}}}[/tex]
[tex] {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure exactly where to begin here. Particularly, how to proceed in the: 2-D and 3-D; cases since I have extra variables to deal with in those GT equations.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey,
Gokul43201 said:
How would you proceed in the 1-D case?
Well, in the 1-D case we are only considering motion along one axis, where [itex]{\vec{v}}[/itex] is a constant, hence the following Galilean Transformation,
[tex] {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}[/tex]

[tex] {{y}^{\prime}} = {y}[/tex]

[tex] {{z}^{\prime}} = {z}[/tex]

[tex] {{t}^{\prime}} = {t}[/tex]

So, my guess is that by beginning with the following,
[tex] {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}[/tex]

I can proceed as follows,
[tex] {{x}^{\prime}} = {{x}-{vt}}[/tex]

[tex] {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\Bigl[{{x}^{\prime}}\Bigr]}} = {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\Bigl[{{x}-{vt}}\Bigr]}}[/tex]

[tex] {{\frac{d{{x}^{\prime}}}{dt}}} = {{\frac{dx}{dt}}-{v}}[/tex]

[tex] {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\left[{\frac{d{{x}^{\prime}}}{dt}}\right]}} = {{\frac{d}{dt}}{\left[{{\frac{dx}{dt}}-{v}}\right]}}[/tex]

[tex] {\frac{{{d}^{2}}{{x}^{\prime}}}{d{{t}^{2}}}} = {{\frac{{{d}^{2}}{x}}{d{{t}^{2}}}}-{0}}[/tex]

[tex] {\left({{a}^{\prime}}\right)} = {\left({a}\right)}[/tex]

[tex] {{a}^{\prime}} = {a}[/tex]

So, I guess by showing that,
[tex] {{a}^{\prime}} = {a}[/tex]
this implies that N.II.L. is invariant under a (1-D) Galilean Transformation? If so, why?

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited: