Modes of Vibration of 3-DOF Spring Mass System

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the modes of vibration for a three-degree-of-freedom (3-DOF) spring-mass system. Participants explore various methods to derive the modes, including the influence coefficient method and an alternative approach involving amplitude ratios. The context includes theoretical and mathematical reasoning related to the system's natural frequencies and mode shapes.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • The participant has calculated the natural frequencies as 0, 1, and square root of 3 rad/s but is struggling with finding the modes of vibration using the influence coefficient method.
  • Some participants suggest discussing the method further with the instructor if constrained to the influence coefficient approach.
  • Another participant proposes setting up a ratio of amplitudes and provides equations based on assumed solutions involving sine functions.
  • A later reply suggests solving for amplitude values A, B, and C for specific omega values to obtain the mode vector.
  • One participant expresses concern about inconsistencies in the values of B derived from the equations, indicating potential discrepancies in the calculations.
  • Another participant claims that for omega = 0, A = 1 leads to consistent values for B and C, suggesting no inconsistency in that case.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of the influence coefficient method and the resulting calculations for the amplitudes. There is no consensus on the best approach to find the modes of vibration, and some calculations appear to lead to conflicting results.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific assumptions and conditions related to the equations used, such as the choice of A=1 and the implications for B and C. The discussion highlights unresolved mathematical steps and the dependence on the chosen method for analysis.

Reefy
Messages
62
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


20171119_135837.jpg


Homework Equations


a11 = a21 = a31 = a12 = a13

a22 = a32 = a23

$$
\begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} \\
x_{2} \\
x_{3}
\end{bmatrix}
=ω^2m
\begin{bmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \\
a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\
a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33}
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} \\
x_{2} \\
x_{3}
\end{bmatrix}
$$

$$x_{1} = a_{11}mω^2x_{1}+a_{12}mω^2x_{1}+a_{13}mω^2x_{1}$$
$$x_{2} = a_{21}mω^2x_{2}+a_{22}mω^2x_{2}+a_{23}mω^2x_{2}$$
$$x_{3} = a_{31}mω^2x_{3}+a_{32}mω^2x_{3}+a_{33}mω^2x_{3}$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I have already completed part a. The natural frequencies are 0, 1 and square root of 3 rad/s.

I'm having difficulty finding the modes of vibration. I wanted to use the influence coefficient method where I select the left-most mass to undergo a unit force while keeping the other masses fixed. This would cause a deflection of the left-moss mass and give me my first influence coefficient a11. However, there is no spring to the left of this mass and I'm having trouble figuring out how to apply the influence coefficient method.

$$ a_{22} = a_{32} = a_{23} = \frac {1}{k}$$
$$ a_{33} = \frac {2}{k}$$
$$ a_{11} = a_{21} = a_{31} = a_{12} = a_{13}= ? $$
 

Attachments

  • 20171119_135837.jpg
    20171119_135837.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 2,326
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are seriously constrained to this particular method, you had better talk with your teacher some more.
 
Is there another method that you know of? Can I set up a ratio of the amplitudes? My equations after assuming a solution of
X1,2,3 = Asinωt, Bsinωt, and Csinωt are

$$ A(1-ω^2) - B = 0$$
$$
B(2-ω^2) - A - C = 0
$$
$$
C(1-ω^2) - B = 0 $$
 
For a particular value of omega (0,1,root3), choose A=1 and solve for B and C. That will give you the mode vector for the particular omega value.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Reefy
Ok, if I do that then I get A = C = 1, and then B will equal 1, 0, and -2 for the three different ω
 
Something seems off about that because if I say A = 1, then

$$A(1-ω^2) - B = 0 $$ $$→$$ $$B=(1-ω^2)$$

And

$$C(1-ω^2) - B = 0$$ $$→$$ $$C = B/(1-ω^2) = (1-ω^2)/(1-ω^2) = 1 $$

But I still have the equation for $$B(2-ω^2) - A - C = B(2-ω^2) - 2 = 0$$ $$→$$ $$B=2/(2-ω^2)$$ which will give me slightly different values for B
 
For omega = 0, I get for A=1, then B = C = 1. No inconsistency there, I think.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K