Modulator Extinction Ratio (optical pulses)

  • Thread starter Thread starter n0_3sc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extinction Ratio
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on measuring the peak power and extinction ratio of a Mach-Zehnder modulator used with 400ns optical pulses at a 1MHz repetition rate. Participants recommend using a high-speed amplified optical detector connected to an oscilloscope to measure the AC waveform and determine the extinction ratio using the formula e = (Vhigh - Vzero)/(Vlow - Vzero). The peak power can be calculated from the average power and extinction ratio, with the formula Ppeak = Pavg/(DC + (1-DC)/e). Various methods and considerations regarding detector responsivity and measurement accuracy are also discussed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mach-Zehnder modulators
  • Familiarity with high-speed optical detectors
  • Knowledge of oscilloscope operation and settings
  • Basic principles of optical power measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the use of high-speed amplified optical detectors for pulse measurements
  • Study the principles of extinction ratio calculation in optical systems
  • Learn about the impact of detector responsivity on measurement accuracy
  • Explore advanced techniques for measuring peak power in optical pulses
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, laser technicians, and researchers involved in photonics and optical communication who need to measure and optimize modulator performance.

n0_3sc
Messages
238
Reaction score
1
I am modulating a laser with 400ns pulses at 1MHz. Modulator is a Mach Zehnder.
Can anyone suggest a way of measuring either the peak power of my pulses or the extinction ratio of the modulator.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I havn't heard of a Laser Calorimeter but the pics make it look like a broadband thermal power meter.
I have a thermal power meter but that off course measures the average power. We are talking about roughly 150microwatts average laser power. They are pulsed with 400ns pulses at a 5Mhz rep rate.
At my disposal the equipment I have access too are all sorts of high-speed photodiodes/oscilliscopes/spectral analyzers etc.
 
This measurement is fairly straight forward if you have an optical power meter and a high speed amplified optical detector that you can connect to an oscilloscope. The optical detector needs to be DC coupled.

First measure the average optical power (Pavg) in uW with the optical power meter.

Set up the high speed amplified optical detector and oscilloscope. You'll probably need to set the oscilloscope input impedance to 50ohms.

With no optical input to the detector measure the DC level, call this Vzero.

Then measure the AC waveform with the high speed amplified optical detector and the oscilloscope.

The extinction ratio is; e = (Vhigh - Vzero)/(Vlow - Vzero).

To determine the peak power you first need to measure the duty cycle (DC) of the ACwaveform. Then Ppeak = Pavg/(DC + (1-DC)/e)
 
Hey Uraptor,
The method I was suggested was too measure the difference in voltage from 'high' to 'low' on the oscilliscope V_1, and since I know my high speed optical detector's Responsivity R and the relation:
I_{out} = RP_{in}
where I_{out} is the current generated by the photodetector.
Then I_{out} = \frac{V_1}{Z}
where Z is the 50ohm impedance matched connection.
Substituting should give me the peak power P_{in}, right?

I am however curious about your method. You quote having to use a "high speed amplified optical detector", but wouldn't the amplification give a larger than expected peak power? I also find it hard to believe that the responsivity plays no role in your calculation.
Also, could you please explain how you established that formula for the peak power?
 
Your signal is fairly small that is the reason I suggested using an amplified optical detector.

Recall that an optical power meter is used to determine the average power of the signal.

Extinction ratio = V1/V0 = I1*Z/I0*Z = I1/I0 = P1*R/P0*R = P1/P0

The detector responsivity cancels out.

Now the peak power can be determined from the average power if you know extinction ratio and duty cycle -see attached file.

Assuming the detector responsivity you have been given is accurate your method will also work. As a sanity check it's probably a good idea to make the measurement both ways. Once you're convinced that both methods work just use the easiest one.
 

Attachments

Thanks Uraptor. That pdf was very helpful.
When my experiments are all up and running again, I will try both techniques for peak power measurement and list my result.
 
Uraptor said:
The extinction ratio is; e = (Vhigh - Vzero)/(Vlow - Vzero).

Your pdf quotes \epsilon = \frac{P1}{P0}, now the extinction ratio in the quote is a voltage ratio, so do I need to square 'e' to get the same \epsilon as in your pdf?
 
So I've been trying to measure P0 (The DC power level).
One problem: The DC power/voltage level stays the same with no input signal and an input signal. I do expect the dc level to be very very low since I'm modulating the same pulse twice squaring the extinction ratio. But I know my dc level isn't 0 because that would make the extinction ratio = infinity! Impossible!

What else can I do?
 
  • #10
n0_3sc said:
One problem: The DC power/voltage level stays the same with no input signal and an input signal.
This is the voltage level on my high speed oscilloscope.
 
  • #11
Remember

Extinction ratio = V1/V0 = I1*Z/I0*Z = I1/I0 = P1*R/P0*R = P1/P0
 
  • #12
Can you turn down the modulation level to a low extinction ratio just to verify that your set up is working?

Once the extinction ratio is greater than 15 it becomes quite difficult to measure accurately.
 
  • #13
The extinction ratio of the setup I had was supposedly >>15...
That setup is gone because the modulator failed (possibly too high powers).

I am using a simple setup now whose extinction ratio isn't that high. I compared your technique to measuring the peak power and the technique I was told - there is a factor of 2 difference. ie. Your technique yields an answer two times greater. I don't agree with my technique 100% since the Responsivity is wavelength dependent and I just approximated it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K