Modulus Equation: Solving for ##p## & ##m##

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modulus
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the modulus equation involving two unknowns, p and m, derived from the original equation. It highlights the challenge of having more unknowns than equations, emphasizing that true solving isn't possible in such cases. The conversation points out the introduction of extraneous solutions when squaring both sides of an equation. A successful resolution was achieved through simultaneous equations, leading to specific values for x and y. Alternative methods were also suggested, reinforcing the importance of maintaining non-negativity in the terms of the equations.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
solve the modulus equation ##2|3x+4y-2|+3(25-5x+2y)^{1/2} = 0##
Relevant Equations
modulus equations
##3√(25-5x+2y) = -2|3x+4y-2|##
→##9(25-5x+2y)=4[(3x+4y)^2-4(3x+4y)+4]##
→##9 (25+m)= 4[p^2-4p+4]## where ##p= 3x+4y## & ##m= 2y-5x##
##\frac{(p-2)^2}{25+m}##=## \frac{9}{4}##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello again,

You have one equation with two unknowns, and you work it around to one equation in two unknowns. That does not help very much.

Are you aware that the term 'solving' is not applicable if there are more unknowns than equations ? E.g. ##x+y=4## is not solvable. All one can do is work it around to e.g. ##y = 4-x##.

Is that the aim of this exercise ?

Then: you square left and right sides of an equation. Do you realize that introduces unwanted solutions ? Look at e.g. the equation ##z = -2##, a single solution. Whereas ##z^2 = 4## has two solutions ?

Having said all this, there is something remarkable with your first equation:
$$2|3x+4y-2|+3(25-5x+2y)^{1/2} = 0 $$
(you want curly brackets around the exponent 1/2 )

You have two terms that are non-negative and should add up to zero.
What is the only way in which that can be so :biggrin: ?
 
  • Like
Likes ehild
BvU said:
(you want curly brackets around the exponent 1/2 )
Fixed in original post.
 
a colleague was able to solve it for me...by coming up with simultaneous equations:

##|6x+8y-4| =√(225-45x+18y)##
##|6x+8y-4| =-√(225-45x+18y)##...on solving the simultaneous by subtracting both sides of the equation,

##2√(225-45x+18y)=0##
##45x-18y=225## also using
##-6x-8y+4= 6x+8y-4## we get
##3x+4y=2##
now solving,
##45x-18y=225##
##3x+4y=2##
##x=4## ##y=-2.5##
is there another approach? or this is the only way? just thinking of the approach that i had used...
 
chwala said:
is there another approach?
Definitely. $$a+b = 0 \quad \&\quad a \ge 0 \quad \& \quad b\ge 0 \quad {\bf \Rightarrow} \quad a = 0 \quad \& \quad b = 0 $$
and now you have two equations with two unknowns:$$25-5x+2y = 0 \quad \& \quad 3x+4y-2 = 0 $$with, of course, the same answer -- without multiplying within the | | and underneath the square root
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
Thanks man...you guys chew maths like crazy:cool:
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K