Molecular Dynamics simulations Surface interaction energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating surface interaction energies in molecular dynamics simulations involving a gold fcc100 cluster and a platinum fcc111 surface. The user seeks to determine surface free energies for Wulff shape calculations using periodic boundary conditions. The conversation highlights the slab model approach, where periodic conditions are applied in the x and y directions, and discusses the necessity of a vacuum gap or the removal of periodicity in the z-direction. The formula for surface energy, Esurf=(Eslab-Ebulk)/2, is provided, emphasizing the importance of symmetry and cluster size for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Molecular Dynamics simulations
  • Slab model methodology
  • Periodic boundary conditions in computational physics
  • Wulff shape theory in materials science
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of vacuum boundary conditions in molecular dynamics simulations
  • Study the Wulff construction and its implications for nanoparticle morphology
  • Explore convergence tests for surface energy calculations in classical potentials
  • Investigate literature on surface interaction energies in metal clusters
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for undergraduate students, researchers in materials science, and anyone involved in molecular dynamics simulations, particularly those focusing on surface interactions and energy calculations.

dikmikkel
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
Hey,
I've simulated a solid metal cluster of gold fcc100
And a surface Platinum in fcc111 using a classical mechanical approach.
Do you think i could get the surface free energies(the ones to use in determining the Wulff shape) from periodic boundary conditions and if so how? I am really confused, i need to make an approximation of the height and width of the melted particle so i would like the energy in the UP/z direction.

The gold cluster is cubic at the initial state btw.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Surface energies can be obtained using a slab model in which you orient the surface of interest to be normal to z-axis (for example). You apply periodic boundary conditions in x and y but in z-direction you have two options. Either still using periodic boundary conditions but leave a vacuum gap above the surface of a thickness > 1nm (a convergence test is needed here) or if you are using classical potentials you can actually remove the periodicity in z and use a vacuum boundary condition in this direction. IN that case
Esurf=(Eslab-Ebulk)/2 , The factor of two because you have two exposed surfaces.

The nanoparticle/ cluster approach you described above is not common and indeed may not always be useful to calculate the surface energy beacause:
1- All the faces of the cluster should represent the same surface. This is very hard to achieve unless the material has a crystal structure of high symmetry.
2- One may need a very large cluster to guarantee convergence.
 
Hi again,
Thank you for the clear answer.
I just want to estimate the energies for determining how high and wide the cluster will be at some state.
I simulate an actual surface with an on it resting cluster, and not a potential difference, so it is a bit more coumbersome i think.

But how will i determine the wulff shape from the initial state, i have only 6 faces and to me it looks like it will be a triangle(3d). Do you have any litterature to recommend, this stuff is mabye not so much at my level(undergraduate).

Thanks again
Edit:
Btw. it is the contanct energy between cluster and surface which is interesting
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K