Molecular Geometry: Computing & VSEPR Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of molecular geometry and the application of VSEPR theory, particularly in the context of the dynamic nature of electrons and molecular shapes. Participants explore the implications of molecular motion and the concept of fluxional compounds, as well as the Born-Oppenheimer approximation in relation to molecular geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how molecular geometry can be computed given that electrons are in constant motion, suggesting that geometries may be temporary rather than fixed.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of fluxional compounds, noting that they are in a constant state of change and providing examples such as amines.
  • A participant expresses interest in the definition of fluxional compounds and asks about the probability of predicted geometries occurring, as well as the meaning of oscillation around a predicted geometry.
  • Further clarification is provided on fluxional compounds, with an example of bis(cyclopentadienyl)mercury (II) and its different bonding configurations.
  • One participant asserts that molecules do not have a fixed shape fundamentally, and that the concept of shape arises from the application of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation.
  • A question is posed regarding the specifics of what the Born-Oppenheimer approximation states about molecular expressions.
  • A suggestion is made to search for resources on the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, including a recommendation for a book on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the nature of molecular geometry, with some emphasizing the dynamic aspects of molecular shapes while others focus on the theoretical frameworks like the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these concepts on molecular geometry.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about molecular motion and the applicability of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. The implications of these assumptions on the accuracy of predicted geometries are not fully explored.

Godwin Kessy
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Hey! How can we compute the molecular geometry for molecules and further use the VSEPR since electrons are continouly in motion, of which i actualy expected to have temporary geometries ie. Oscilatin once an not a fixed or rigid which shows as if the system is static!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Fluxional compounds do just as you say. They are in a constant state of change. Most amines are examples of this. More stable compounds are in constant motion as well(above absolute zero) but the motion is motion about a certain geometry. The average structure is the one usually shown since it is difficult to draw a vibrating thingy every time you discuss something.
 
Thanks i now get it! But what do you actually mean by fluxional compounds. gec am interested

also do u min that the geometries we actualy predict cary large probability of occurrence? Oh what did you actualy mean that it oscilate round the predicted geometry!
 
The latter for most compounds. By fluxional I mean that some compounds interconvert between different 'shapes'. Examples of these are the organometallic compounds such as bis(cyclopentadienyl)mercury (II) that exists both as the bis-monohapto and bis-pentahapto complexes. In the bis-monohapto complex the mercury is sigma bonded once to two carbon atoms... one on each of the two cyclopentadiene groups. In the bis-pentahapto complex, the mercury is bonded to every carbon in both cyclopentadienyl groups. That's about as fluxional as you can get.
 
You are right, molecules don't have a shape on a fundamental level. The shape arises as a new concept upon application of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation.
Basically, we are replacing the molecular system of interest by a model system of particles with defined shape which is easier to describe. The error e.g. in energy from this approximation is small on a chemical scale but may be too large on a spectroscopic scale.
 
Hey what does the born approximations say on the molecular expresions
 
Just google for "Born Oppenheimer" you should find tons of references. A fascinating but high brow book on the topic is "Chemistry, quantum mechanics, and reductionism : perspectives in theoretical chemistry / Hans Primas".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
15K