Orbital theory - Molecular vs Hybrid orbitals

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of Molecular Orbital (MO) theory and Hybridization in the context of atomic orbitals, particularly focusing on their roles in bonding and the formation of sigma and pi bonds. Participants explore the distinctions and relationships between hybrid orbitals and molecular orbitals, using examples from organic chemistry, such as 1,3-butadiene.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that atomic orbitals can become either hybrid orbitals, which form sigma bonds, or molecular orbitals, which allow electrons to float freely and form pi bonds.
  • Others argue that the Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals - Molecular Orbital (LCAO-MO) theory does not specify the nature of the atomic orbitals used and that hybridization is a useful approach to address limitations in predictions made by hydrogen-like atomic orbitals.
  • A participant questions the classification of sp, sp2, and sp3 orbitals as atomic orbitals, suggesting confusion over their designation as hybrid orbitals.
  • Some participants clarify that hybridized orbitals are still considered atomic orbitals since they are calculated for individual atoms, while molecular orbitals result from combinations of atomic orbitals from different atoms.
  • There is a mention that some molecular orbitals can be anti-bonding, which complicates the relationship between molecular orbitals and bond formation.
  • A suggestion is made to consult quantum chemistry literature for a deeper understanding of molecular orbital theory and its applications in organic chemistry.
  • One participant notes that hybrid orbitals are a concept from valence bond theory, which contrasts with molecular orbital theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the definitions and roles of hybrid and molecular orbitals, and participants express uncertainty about the relationships between these concepts. No consensus is reached on the interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the distinctions between atomic and hybrid orbitals, as well as the implications of using different types of orbitals in molecular orbital theory. There is also mention of unresolved mathematical steps and definitions that may affect interpretations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and individuals interested in organic chemistry, molecular orbital theory, and the underlying principles of bonding in chemistry.

christian0710
Messages
407
Reaction score
8
Hi I have a question regarding Molecular orbital theory:
Is it correctly understood that if we combine 2 or more atoms the atomic orbitals can become 2 things: They can either become Hybrid orbitals which are the orbitals that form sigma bonds between atoms, or they can become Molecular orbitals which are orbitals allowing the electrons to float freely around in the molecule in conjugated molecules and they always form pi bonds?

An example would be 1,3-butadiene: it has 4 molecular p-orbitals and 2*3= 6 hybridized sp2 orbitals? So the p-orbitals maintain their shape (like the atomic p-orbitals) but now we call them molecular orbitals.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
christian0710 said:
Hi I have a question regarding Molecular orbital theory:
Is it correctly understood that if we combine 2 or more atoms the atomic orbitals can become 2 things: They can either become Hybrid orbitals which are the orbitals that form sigma bonds between atoms, or they can become Molecular orbitals which are orbitals allowing the electrons to float freely around in the molecule in conjugated molecules and they always form pi bonds?
Not exactly. The molecular orbital theory you are talking about is better known as LCAO-MO: Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals - Molecular Orbital. It is based on the idea that an MO can be approximated as the LC of AOs located on different atoms, but it says nothing about what those AOs should be. Most often, taking hydrogen-like AOs gives a good enough approximation to the MOs.

However, there are cases, and carbon is a good example, where these hydrogen-like AOs give predictions (such as bond angles) which make no sense. A good solution to this problem is hybridization: take the hydrogen-like orbitals, make linear combination of them into hybrid AOs, and use those in LCAO-MO theory.

christian0710 said:
An example would be 1,3-butadiene: it has 4 molecular p-orbitals and 2*3= 6 hybridized sp2 orbitals? So the p-orbitals maintain their shape (like the atomic p-orbitals) but now we call them molecular orbitals.
The sp2 orbitals are AOs, which combine into MOs to form the σ bonds. The un-hybridized (left over) p AOs combine into MOs to form π bonds.
 
Hi and thank you for the reply:
So in the below example you mention that sp2 orbitals ARE atomic orbitals (how can sp,sp2,sp3 be atomic orbitals- I thought they were only hybrid orbitals?) which form to combine Molecular orbitals. I'm not sure I'm following what you wrote aboute the LCAO-MO theory. So is it a incorrectly understood that when atomic orbitals combine they form hybrid orbitals (which form sigma bonds), and the left over orbitals (which are not hybridized) Can or cannot overlap to form sigma bonds?
 
Can you recommend a book i can read to understand it more clearly? I'm taking organic chemistry, and I wan't to understand how Molecular Orbital theory can descibe or account for all the chemical bonds and chemical interactions taking place in chemistry.
 
christian0710 said:
Hi and thank you for the reply:
So in the below example you mention that sp2 orbitals ARE atomic orbitals (how can sp,sp2,sp3 be atomic orbitals- I thought they were only hybrid orbitals?)
Atomic orbitals correspond to possible states for electrons in an atom. The hybirdized sp, sp2 and sp3 orbitals are still orbitals calculated for one atom, and therefore are atomic orbitals.

I mentionned "hydrogen-like" orbitals because the s, p and d orbitals that you are familiar with are adapted from the solution you get for the hydrogen atom (only one electron). When considering atoms with more than one electron, exact solutions are not possible, and an approximate description for orbitals is used.

christian0710 said:
So is it a incorrectly understood that when atomic orbitals combine they form hybrid orbitals (which form sigma bonds), and the left over orbitals (which are not hybridized) Can or cannot overlap to form sigma bonds?
When atomic orbitals are combined on one atom, the result is called hybrid orbtials (which are still atomic orbitals). When atomic orbitals are combined on different atoms, the result is a molecular orbital. When molecular orbitals are occupied, this can lead to the formation of a bond (ut not necessarily, some molecular orbitals are anti-bonding).

In organic chemistry, you are mainly concerned with the hybridization of C (although N hybridization can also explain the bonding in some molecules). In most cases, the hybrid orbitals will form sigma bonds and the left-over p orbitals (for sp and sp2) will make pi bonds.

christian0710 said:
Can you recommend a book i can read to understand it more clearly? I'm taking organic chemistry, and I wan't to understand how Molecular Orbital theory can descibe or account for all the chemical bonds and chemical interactions taking place in chemistry.
You have to look at books on quantum chemistry. A good choice is the one by McQuarrie:http://books.google.se/books/about/Quantum_Chemistry.html?id=zzxLTIljQB4C&redir_esc=y
 
One should also mention that hybrid orbitals are a concept from valence bond theory rather than molecular orbital theory.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K