Moller scattering polarized cross section

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the analytical expression for the scattering cross section of two longitudinally polarized electrons at tree level. The total scattering amplitude is expressed as a combination of the t-channel and u-channel contributions, incorporating the Mandelstam variables t and u. The user encounters difficulty in summing over final spins due to predefined initial spins being helicity eigenstates. A reference paper by Adam M. Bincer is mentioned, but the user seeks a frame-independent square of the scattering amplitude in terms of 4-momenta for broader applicability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and rules
  • Familiarity with Mandelstam variables (t and u)
  • Knowledge of scattering theory and cross-section calculations
  • Proficiency in using trace techniques in quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of scattering amplitudes in quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Learn about helicity states and their implications in particle physics
  • Explore the use of symbolic computation software for trace calculations in QFT
  • Read the referenced paper by Adam M. Bincer for insights on longitudinally polarized fermions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in particle physics, and researchers focusing on scattering processes involving polarized particles.

kontejnjer
Messages
71
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement


[/B]
(Note: this is not strictly homework, but it is related to one course I'm doing, and I can't find a useful solution anywhere)
Find the analytical expression for the scattering cross section of two longitudinally polarized electrons at tree level.

Homework Equations


[/B]
\displaystyle d\sigma=\left|\mathcal{M}_{fi}\right|^2\frac{d\Phi}{4I}
Feynman rules

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
There's two diagrams at tree level since the particles are identical: the t channel and the u channel. There is a relative minus sign between the channels due to the fact the particles are identical fermions. The total scattering amplitude is:
\displaystyle i\mathcal{M}_{fi}=i\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t+i\mathcal{M}_{fi}^u=\frac{e^2}{t}\bar u^{s'}(p_4)\gamma^\mu u^s (p_2) \bar u^{r'} (p_3)\gamma_\mu u^r (p_1)-\frac{e^2}{u}\bar u^{r'}(p_3)\gamma^\mu u^s (p_2) \bar u^{s'} (p_4)\gamma_\mu u^r(p_1)

Here t=(p_3-p_1)^2, u=(p_4-p_1)^2 are the Mandelstam variables, p_1 and p_2 are inital momenta with spins r and s respectively, and final momenta p_3 and p_4 with spins r' and s' respectively. As the initial electrons are longitudinally polarized, we know their spin states, however we still need to sum over the final spins, so the square of the amplitude is:

\left|\mathcal{M}_{fi}\right|^2=\sum\limits_{s',r'} \left(|\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t|^2+|\mathcal{M}_{fi}^u|^2-2(\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t)^* \mathcal{M}_{fi}^u\right)

After some manipulation, and using the identity \sum\limits_{s}u^s(p)\bar u^s(p)=\gamma\cdot p+m, we can write down the square of each component as:

<br /> \sum\limits_{s&#039;,r&#039;}|\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t|^2=\frac{e^4}{t^2}{Tr}\left[\gamma^\mu u^s(p_2) \bar u^s(p_2)\gamma^\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_4+m)\right]\cdot {Tr}\left[\gamma_\mu u^r(p_1)\bar u^r (p_1) \gamma_\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_3+m)\right]\\<br /> \sum\limits_{s&#039;,r&#039;}|\mathcal{M}_{fi}^u|^2=\frac{e^4}{u^2}{Tr}\left[\gamma^\mu u^s(p_2) \bar u^s(p_2)\gamma^\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_3+m)\right]\cdot {Tr}\left[\gamma_\mu u^r(p_1)\bar u^r (p_1) \gamma_\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_4+m)\right]\\<br /> \sum\limits_{s&#039;,r&#039;}(\mathcal{M}_{fi}^t)^* \mathcal{M}_{fi}^u=\frac{e^4}{ut}{Tr} \left[\gamma^\mu u^s(p_2) \bar u^s(p_2)\gamma^\nu(\gamma\cdot{p}_3+m) \gamma_\mu u^r(p_1)\bar u^r (p_1) \gamma_\nu (\gamma\cdot{p}_4+m)\right]

This is the part that I get stuck on: the initial spins are predefined so I can't just sum over them, and the previously mentioned identity doesn't work in this case, all I know is that the initial spins should be helicity eigenstates. There's a reference paper for this exact topic by Adam M. Bincer - Scattering of longitudinally polarized fermions (DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.107.1434), but the notation is somewhat outdated and I think it omits some crucial steps.

I know I could just pick a representation and a frame and do the whole trace calculation using some symbolic software, but the end result doesn't give me much qualitative info, what I'd like is to just have a frame-independent square of the scattering amplitude in terms of 4-momenta, so I can just pick any frame (say, COM or lab) and get the analytic result. Any advice or hints would be greatly appreciated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CAF123
Nope, I'm still no closer to a solution than I was a week ago. Any takers?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K