Moment of force, stabilising a board carried over shoulder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the moment of force and stabilization of a board being carried over a shoulder. The board is 3 meters long, weighs 32N, and has specific lengths extending behind and in front of the carrier's shoulder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the forces acting on the board, including the weight and reaction forces at the shoulder and hand. There are attempts to apply the concept of moments and vertical components to analyze the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confusion regarding the application of moments and vertical components, while others suggest using different pivot points for calculations. There is a mix of understanding and uncertainty, with some guidance provided on setting up equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention a lack of clarity in their lectures regarding the topic, which may contribute to their confusion. There is also a suggestion that a diagram could aid in understanding the problem better.

Rbraind
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 3m board is carried and has a weight of 32N. 1.8m sticks out behind the carriers shoulder,1.2m in front and his hand is 0.4m from the shoulder.How much downward force needs to be applied at the hand to stabilise the board. Assume the weight is evenly distributed along the board. I'm confused.


Homework Equations


T=Fd



The Attempt at a Solution


how do i measure the force over the whole board, will it be 32N at 1.8m and 1.2m and 0.4m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Rbraind! :smile:

There are three forces on the board: the weight, and the two reaction forces.

Do vertical components, then do moments (about some suitable point) …

what do you get? :wink:
 
thankyou tiny-tim! - not sure if I'm completely on the right track but am feeling warmer.
Three forces on the board - the 32N and then his hand and shoulder will have reaction forces yes? So moments would be moment of inertia I am thinking I=mr2
If I do 1.5 (the some point?...pivot point!) and x by 0.4m I get 0.24, then do I times this by gravity 9.81 ?? We only covered this really briefly in our lecture so I'm trying to make sense of my textbook...hope I'm getting closer. Can't wait till I can be the one giving good advice on the forums...one day :)
 
Rbraind said:
If I do 1.5 (the some point?...pivot point!) and x by 0.4m I get 0.24, then do I times this by gravity 9.81 ??

(moment of inertia is irrelevant)

Call the reaction forces A and B.

Write out the vertical components equation, and then the moments equation about the shoulder as the pivot point.
 
Nope I'm lost. But thanks for your help.I feel like its in there but the more i try to make sense of it the more my brain feels like exploding. 32N pushes down on his shoulder and 32N back up - pivot point must be 0.3m from his shoulder and 0.7m from his hand ? I don't get vertical components and moment equation ? I'm studying by distance and our lecture really skimmed through this bit, i should take it up with the lecturer but think I've left it too late. I love trying to work it out but I just can't make sense of the method...arggghhhh
 
Perhaps a diagram would help.
 

Attachments

  • Fig4.gif
    Fig4.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 535
Hi Rbraind!
Rbraind said:
32N pushes down on his shoulder and 32N back up

That's right … so the vertical components equation is A + B = 32 :smile:
- pivot point must be 0.3m from his shoulder and 0.7m from his hand ? I don't get vertical components and moment equation ?

Yes and no :smile:

You can choose the pivot point to be anywhere.

You've chosen it to be where the weight W is.

So you'll have a moments equation involving A and B but not W.

That's fine … that'll be your second equation in A and B, and you can solve the two equations simultaneously.

Perhaps an easier way would be to use the shoulder as the pivot point … then your moments equation involves A and W but not B, which is quicker to solve. :wink:

Do it both ways, just to see …

what do you get? :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K