Moment of inertia and work problem

coolbyte
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4.00-m length of light nylon cord is wound around a uniform cylindrical spool of radius 0.500 m and mass 1.00 kg. The spool is mounted on a frictionless axle and is initially at rest. The cord is pulled from the spool with a constant acceleration of magnitude 2.82 m/s2.

How much work has been done on the spool when it reaches an angular speed of 7.95 rad/s?


Homework Equations



Angular acceleration = a/r
Moment of inertia of the cylinder is mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved for tension first: T*0.5 = 1*(0.5)^2*(2.82 / 0.5)=> So T=2.82 N

Then using kinematic equations I solved for theta:

Angular acceleration = a/r = 2.82/0.5 = 5.64

so

7.95^2 = 2 * 5.64 * theta ==> theta = 5.6

so work = 2.82 * 5.6 * 0.5 = 7.896 joules
However webassign says I'm wrong, any help would be greatly appreciated as I spent too much time into this, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coolbyte said:
Moment of inertia of the cylinder is mr^2
That would be for a hollow cylinder. I would assume the spool is solid.
I solved for tension first: T*0.5 = 1*(0.5)^2*(2.82 / 0.5)=> So T=2.82 N
That's a long way round. Just use the angular KE formula, Iω2/2.
 
It looks like you calculated the polar moment of inertia incorrectly. Recheck your formula. Also, even though your approach should deliver the correct answer, it would be much easier to solve this problem by applying conservation of energy. That way, you wouldn't even have to calculate the tension.
 
haruspex said:
That would be for a hollow cylinder. I would assume the spool is solid.

That's a long way round. Just use the angular KE formula, Iω2/2.

Thanks mate, you're right, those formulas always confuse me.
 
coolbyte said:
Thanks mate, you're right, those formulas always confuse me.
mr2 applies for a point mass at distance r, so that must also be the formula for a hoop about a line orthogonal to the plane of the hoop, and for a hollow thin shell cylinder about its axis. That's because in each of those cases every part part of the body rotates at radius r from the axis. For a solid disc or cylinder, or for a sphere (solid or hollow), or for a hoop rotating about a diameter, it must be less, since no part rotates at distance greater than r but some parts rotate at a shorter distance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K