Why Is Angular Momentum Not Conserved When a Cylinder Moves on a Stopping Board?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mark128
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Board Cylinder
Mark128
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
On the flat surface lays a flat board with mass M, and on the board - a cylinder with mass m and radius r. Initially, board moves with velocity v, and cylinder rotates with such angular velocity, that it's stationary relative to the ground. Because of friciton between the board and surface, the board stops after some time. What is velocity of cylinder after that happens?
Relevant Equations
--
cylinder.PNG

I've been trying to solve it mainly through conservation of momentum and angular momentum, appareantly it's not correct. My idea was:
I, Moment of inertia = 0.5*m*r^2
L1, initial angular momentum = I * v/r

After a board stops, the change in it's momentum is M*v, so the impulse of torque on the cylinder will be M*v*r.

So the change in angular momentum is M*v*r.

So L2-0.5*m*r^2 = M*v*r

L2 = 0.5*m*r*v_final

So v_final = v*(0.5*m + M)/(0.5*m)

But as mentioned earlier, it's incorrect and I'm also not entirely sure which part is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
You can only take angular momentum about some chosen axis to be conserved in a system if there are no external forces that have a torque about that axis. You appear to be taking the centre of the cylinder as axis, but there is friction (rolling contact) between the cylinder and the board.
What axis could you use to avoid this difficulty?
 
haruspex said:
You can only take angular momentum about some chosen axis to be conserved in a system if there are no external forces that have a torque about that axis. You appear to be taking the centre of the cylinder as axis, but there is friction (rolling contact) between the cylinder and the board.
What axis could you use to avoid this difficulty?

Yes, I was taking a center of the cylinder keeping in mind, that there is friction acting on it, and that's why change in angular momentum (L2-L1) is non-zero.

If I choose point of contact as center, the angular momentum is in fact conserved, but I don't know, how this could help.
 
Mark128 said:
Yes, I was taking a center of the cylinder keeping in mind, that there is friction acting on it, and that's why change in angular momentum (L2-L1) is non-zero.

If I choose point of contact as center, the angular momentum is in fact conserved, but I don't know, how this could help.
There are two ways you can solve it:
1. Take moments about the cylinder’s centre, but include the torque from friction with the board and write a linear momentum equation also involving the friction. (You will have terms like ##\int F.dt##.)
2. Take moments about a point at the surface of the board. (Better not to think of it as a point fixed to the board or the point of contact over time since in principle that gets you into noninertial frames.) Since angular momentum of the cylinder is conserved about such a point you can get the answer in one equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
19K
Replies
18
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K