Moment of Inertia for Half Disk

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia of a thin, flat plate shaped like a semicircle, rotating about its straight edge. The problem involves understanding the relationship between mass, radius, and the moment of inertia, with specific reference to the perpendicular axis theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various attempts to apply the moment of inertia formula and the perpendicular axis theorem. There are questions about the correct setup for the integrals and the interpretation of the axes involved. Some participants express confusion about the relationship between the full disk and the half disk in terms of mass and inertia.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their calculations and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of the perpendicular axis theorem, but there remains uncertainty about the correct interpretation of the axes and the mass involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding whether the moment of inertia should be calculated for the full disk or the half disk, as well as the implications of using different axes for the calculations. Participants are also grappling with the definitions of the variables and the setup of the integrals.

bphys348
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. Question:
What is the moment of inertia of a thin, flat plate in the shape of a semicircle rotating about the straight side (Fig. 12.28)? The mass of the plate is M and the radius is R

The diagram is attached for reference.

Homework Equations


Moment of Inertia: I = ∫R2dm
Perpendicular Axis Theorem: Iz = Ix + Iy

The Attempt at a Solution


I made attempts to solve this is a couple of ways...

First attempt: Using I = ∫R2dm

I chose the y-axis to be parallel to the distance from the axis of rotation to mass elements on the disk.

I defined the distance from the rotation axis y = rsinΘ, where r is the distance of the mass element from the center.

In my integral for I, I substituted for R2, r2sin2Θ

dm = (M/A)*dA where A=(πR2)/2 and dA=drdΘ

Plugging into the integral, I get I = 2M/(πR2) ∫r2dr from o to R * ∫sin2ΘdΘ from 0 to π

Solving, I get MR/3

Now, I know there is something fundamentally wrong with process because I realize I should have some multiple of R2... Was hoping someone could help shed some light

Attempt 2
I believe the problem becomes much simpler if I use the perpendicular axis theorem but I still failed to get the correct answer this way.

Iz = Ix + Iy

Ix would mean the half disk coincides with the radial center of the disk. Ix (for a full circle) = (MR2)/2 but we have of a disk, so I believe Ix= (MR2)/4

Iy would mean the half disk rotation about the y-axis intersecting the radial center. Iy (for a full circle) = (MR2)/4 but this is a half disk to Iy = (MR2)/8

Ix + Iy = Iz, for which I get (3MR2)/8

Book says the solution is (MR2)/4 so I'm a little frustrated at this point.

Any help would be great, thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Diagram.jpg
    Diagram.jpg
    4.9 KB · Views: 2,470
Physics news on Phys.org
bphys348 said:
Attempt 2
I believe the problem becomes much simpler if I use the perpendicular axis theorem but I still failed to get the correct answer this way.

Iz = Ix + Iy
That's the way to go, but let Iz be that of a full disk about its axis. Then you'll solve for Ix and Iy, for a full disk. Then getting half a disk should be easy.
 
bphys348 said:
axis theorem but I still failed to get the correct answer this way.

Iz = Ix + Iy

Ix would mean the half disk coincides with the radial center of the disk. Ix (for a full circle) = (MR2)/2 but we have of a disk, so I believe Ix= (MR2)/4
Not sure I understand what you wrote there, but bear in mind that if you want M to be the mass of the half disk then the full disk has mass 2M.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks for the tips. I think I'm missing something in my understanding...

If I let Iz be that of a full disk about its axis, you mean through its center and perpendicular to its faces, correct?

The math works out in that case and I get Iz = (1/4)MR2 but it seems to me that that is answering a different question. Shouldn't Iz be through the center and parallel to its faces, as the question asks? This confuses me

Thanks!
 
bphys348 said:
If I let Iz be that of a full disk about its axis, you mean through its center and perpendicular to its faces, correct?
Right.

The math works out in that case and I get Iz = (1/4)MR2 but it seems to me that that is answering a different question.
How did you get that?

Shouldn't Iz be through the center and parallel to its faces, as the question asks? This confuses me
No. Iz should be known. You'll solve for Ix and Iy. Ix (or Iy) will be through the center and parallel to the face.
 
If Iz is through the center and perpendicular to the faces, Ix is though the center and parallel to the faces and Iy is through the center and parallel to the faces (but at 90 degrees to Iy)

So Ix is what I want to find

Iz = (1/2)MR2

Iy = (1/4)MR2

Ix = Iz - Iy = (1/2)MR2 - (1/4)MR2 = (1/4)MR2

But this is only a half disk, so Ix = (1/2)(1/4)MR2 = (1/8)MR2
 
bphys348 said:
If Iz is through the center and perpendicular to the faces, Ix is though the center and parallel to the faces and Iy is through the center and parallel to the faces (but at 90 degrees to Iy)

So Ix is what I want to find

Iz = (1/2)MR2

Iy = (1/4)MR2

Ix = Iz - Iy = (1/2)MR2 - (1/4)MR2 = (1/4)MR2

But this is only a half disk, so Ix = (1/2)(1/4)MR2 = (1/8)MR2
Excellent. (You didn't have to solve for Ix by subtracting. By symmetry, you know that Ix and Iy must be equal, so Ix = Iy = (1/2)Iz.)

Now recall that "M" is the mass of a full disk. Rewrite in terms of the mass of just the half disk and you are done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
k. Got it

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
15K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K