Moment of Inertia Formula Query

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
Iain123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, this formula was given to me in an exam to find the moment of inertia of an I beam,

https://ibb.co/jY7ZKG
jY7ZKG


jY7ZKG

However this formula seems to give a different answer to the standard bd^3/12 method, is the formula in the image wrong ?
Thanks
 
on Phys.org
Hello Iain, :welcome:

Interesting, an exam that provides a formula without explaining what the symbols and their dimensions are and (at least, if ##I## stands for the moment of inertia) gives a formula with the wrong dimension.

I see no images. The link works:
upload_2018-1-19_22-45-7.png


What is this and what is your standard ? (not this one, I suppose)
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-19_22-45-7.png
    upload_2018-1-19_22-45-7.png
    37.5 KB · Views: 805
BvU said:
if II stands for the moment of inertia) gives a formula with the wrong dimension.

The dimensions of this expression are L^4 which is entirely appropriate for an AREA moment of inertia, a quantity commonly used in the analysis of beams.
 
I kind of realized that. Would have helped if Iain had mentioned it in post #1 (##I## as moment of inerita is more common for ordinary physicists...:rolleyes: ).

Now: wat is your standard?
 
Thanks for your reply's,
I have attached an image showing my working using both formulas, and also a picture showing the I beam dimensions (web thickness is 20mm).

https://ibb.co/nMDCrw

Using Skyciv's online beam calculator returns an I value of 7.73x10^6 mm^4 , the same as i got on top line. Also this is only concerning the Ixx value and not Iyy , and I is referring to the second moment of area.
I don't understand how the second formula can return a different value and still be correct, i must be missing something :-/
Thanks
 
Last edited:
The answer I = 7733333 mm4 is correct. To make sure, I double checked it with Calcpad:
http://calcpad.net/Spreadsheet/208/double-tee-section

The formula in the exam is correct but it is approximate. It is obtained by taking the web and adding the flanges by the Steiner's theorem:
I = 2t*h3/12 + 2*b*t*(h/2)2
I = t*h3/6 + b*t*h2/2
I = (t*h3/6) + 3*b/h*(t*h3/6)
I = t*h3/6*(1 + 3*b/h)
The problem is that web and flanges overlap, so this formula produces higher values than the exact one.
It can be used only for thin-walled sections where 't' is much smaller than the other dimensions. Then the overlap becomes negligible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action